* compatibility guarantees made by its containing library. Note that the presence of this
 * annotation implies nothing about the quality or performance of the API in question, only the fact
 * that it is not "API-frozen."
 *
 * <p>It is generally safe for <i>applications</i> to depend on beta APIs, at the cost of some extra
 * work during upgrades. However it is generally inadvisable for <i>libraries</i> (which get

 * compatibility guarantees made by its containing library. Note that the presence of this
 * annotation implies nothing about the quality or performance of the API in question, only the fact
 * that it is not "API-frozen."
 *
 * <p>It is generally safe for <i>applications</i> to depend on beta APIs, at the cost of some extra
 * work during upgrades. However it is generally inadvisable for <i>libraries</i> (which get

 * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see
 * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture
 * in com.google.guava:guava differs from the "frozen" copy in the listenablefuture artifact. This
 * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the

 * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see
 * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture
 * in com.google.guava:guava differs from the "frozen" copy in the listenablefuture artifact. This
 * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the

  private static final ImmutableSet<CharSource> BROKEN_SOURCES =
      ImmutableSet.of(BROKEN_CLOSE_SOURCE, BROKEN_OPEN_SOURCE, BROKEN_READ_SOURCE);
  private static final ImmutableSet<CharSink> BROKEN_SINKS =
      ImmutableSet.of(BROKEN_CLOSE_SINK, BROKEN_OPEN_SINK, BROKEN_WRITE_SINK);

  public void testCopyExceptions() {
    if (Closer.create().suppressor instanceof LoggingSuppressor) {

        diff |= (hash1 ^ hash2);

        count++;
        // check whether we've exceeded the probabilistically
        // likely number of trials to have proven no funneling
        if (count > maxCount) {
          Assert.fail(
              "input bit("
                  + i
                  + ") was found not to affect all "
                  + hashBits

   * relation. That is, invoking {@link Function#apply} multiple times for a given value must return
   * equivalent results. For example, {@code
   * Equivalence.identity().onResultOf(Functions.toStringFunction())} is broken because it's not
   * guaranteed that {@link Object#toString}) always returns the same string instance.
   *
   * @since 10.0
   */

   * relation. That is, invoking {@link Function#apply} multiple times for a given value must return
   * equivalent results. For example, {@code
   * Equivalence.identity().onResultOf(Functions.toStringFunction())} is broken because it's not
   * guaranteed that {@link Object#toString}) always returns the same string instance.
   *
   * @since 10.0
   */

      factory.setAccessible(true);
    }
    // Sorts methods/constructors with the least number of parameters first since it's likely easier
    // to fill dummy parameter values for them. Ties are broken by name then by the string form of
    // the parameter list.
    return BY_NUMBER_OF_PARAMETERS
        .compound(BY_METHOD_NAME)
        .compound(BY_PARAMETERS)
        .immutableSortedCopy(factories);
  }

 *       Comparable#compareTo compareTo} returns zero, not whether {@link Object#equals equals}
 *       returns {@code true}.
 *   <li>A class which implements {@code Comparable<UnrelatedType>} is very broken, and will cause
 *       undefined horrible things to happen in {@code Range}. For now, the Range API does not
 *       prevent its use, because this would also rule out all ungenerified (pre-JDK1.5) data types.