* **Uvicorn**:
    * Will have the best performance, as it doesn't have much extra code apart from the server itself.
    * You wouldn't write an application in Uvicorn directly. That would mean that your code would have to include more or less, at least, all the code provided by Starlette (or **FastAPI**). And if you did that, your final application would have the same overhead as having used a framework and minimizing your app code and bugs.

But still, FastAPI got quite some inspiration from Requests.

**Requests** is a library to *interact* with APIs (as a client), while **FastAPI** is a library to *build* APIs (as a server).

They are, more or less, at opposite ends, complementing each other.

Requests has a very simple and intuitive design, it's very easy to use, with sensible defaults. But at the same time, it's very powerful and customizable.

    ```

=== "Python 3.8+"

    ```Python hl_lines="14"
    {!> ../../../docs_src/body_nested_models/tutorial002.py!}
    ```

## Set-Typen

Aber dann denken wir darüber nach und stellen fest, dass sich die Tags nicht wiederholen sollen, es sollen eindeutige Strings sein.

Python hat einen Datentyp speziell für Mengen eindeutiger Dinge: das <abbr title="Menge">`set`</abbr>.

And then they can try again knowing that it's probably something more similar to `stanleyjobsox` than to `johndoe`.

#### A "professional" attack

Of course, the attackers would not try all this by hand, they would write a program to do it, possibly with thousands or millions of tests per second. And would get just one extra correct letter at a time.

Und dann können sie es noch einmal versuchen, wohl wissend, dass es wahrscheinlich eher etwas mit `stanleyjobsox` als mit `johndoe` zu tun hat.

#### Ein „professioneller“ Angriff

Und Sie können auch Validierungen für Zahlen deklarieren:

* `gt`: `g`reater `t`han – größer als
* `ge`: `g`reater than or `e`qual – größer oder gleich
* `lt`: `l`ess `t`han – kleiner als
* `le`: `l`ess than or `e`qual – kleiner oder gleich

!!! info
    `Query`, `Path`, und andere Klassen, die Sie später kennenlernen, sind Unterklassen einer allgemeinen `Param`-Klasse.

So we create a new `dict`, that contains the key-value pairs from `note.dict()` with:

```Python
{**note.dict()}
```

`**note.dict()` "unpacks" the key value pairs directly, so, `{**note.dict()}` would be, more or less, a copy of `note.dict()`.

And then, we extend that copy `dict`, adding another key-value pair: `"id": last_record_id`:

```Python
{**note.dict(), "id": last_record_id}
```

{% endfor %}
{% endif %}

## About the data - technical details

The main intention of this page is to highlight the effort of the community to help others.

Especially including efforts that are normally less visible, and in many cases more arduous, like helping others with questions and reviewing Pull Requests with translations.

    * Normally, a token is set to expire after some time.
        * So, the user will have to log in again at some point later.
        * And if the token is stolen, the risk is less. It is not like a permanent key that will work forever (in most of the cases).
* The frontend stores that token temporarily somewhere.
* The user clicks in the frontend to go to another section of the frontend web app.

An interesting detail is that the percentage of the **CPU used** by each process can **vary** a lot over time, but the **memory (RAM)** normally stays more or less **stable**.

If you have an API that does a comparable amount of computations every time and you have a lot of clients, then the **CPU utilization** will probably *also be stable* (instead of constantly going up and down quickly).