* in the class javadoc.
   *
   * <p>If you can represent the duration as a {@link Duration} (which should be preferred when
   * feasible), use {@link #expireAfterWrite(Duration)} instead.
   *
   * @param duration the length of time after an entry is created that it should be automatically
   *     removed

`minio server http://host{1...4}/disk{1...4}` this requirement added an additional burden to have sequential hostnames for us to make sure that we can provide horizontal distribution, however we have come across situations where sometimes this is not feasible and there are no easier alternatives without modifying /etc/hosts on the host system as root user.  Many times in airgapped deployments this is not allowed or requires audits and approvals.

MinIO server configuration file allows users to provide...

   *   putIfZero.
   *
   * - Allow putIfAbsent and replace to distinguish between zero and absent, but don't implement
   *   remove(K, long). Without any two-phase operations it becomes feasible for all remaining
   *   operations to distinguish between zero and absent. If we do this, then perhaps we should add
   *   replace(key, long).
   *

   * in the class javadoc.
   *
   * <p>If you can represent the duration as a {@link Duration} (which should be preferred when
   * feasible), use {@link #expireAfterWrite(Duration)} instead.
   *
   * @param duration the length of time after an entry is created that it should be automatically
   *     removed

   * {@code initialCapacity} values without resizing. The returned builder is not thread-safe.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> When feasible, {@code initialCapacity} should be the exact number
   * of values that will be added, if that knowledge is readily available. It is better to guess a

   * {@code initialCapacity} values without resizing. The returned builder is not thread-safe.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> When feasible, {@code initialCapacity} should be the exact number
   * of values that will be added, if that knowledge is readily available. It is better to guess a

 *       make it as infeasible as possible to reverse-engineer the input that produced a given hash
 *       code, or even to discover <i>any</i> two distinct inputs that yield the same result. These
 *       are called <i>cryptographic hash functions</i>. But, whenever it is learned that either of
 *       these feats has become computationally feasible, the function is deemed "broken" and should

 *       make it as infeasible as possible to reverse-engineer the input that produced a given hash
 *       code, or even to discover <i>any</i> two distinct inputs that yield the same result. These
 *       are called <i>cryptographic hash functions</i>. But, whenever it is learned that either of
 *       these feats has become computationally feasible, the function is deemed "broken" and should

   * {@code initialCapacity} values without resizing. The returned builder is not thread-safe.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> When feasible, {@code initialCapacity} should be the exact number
   * of values that will be added, if that knowledge is readily available. It is better to guess a

   * {@code initialCapacity} values without resizing. The returned builder is not thread-safe.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> When feasible, {@code initialCapacity} should be the exact number
   * of values that will be added, if that knowledge is readily available. It is better to guess a