throw new UnsupportedOperationException("test should not care about this");
    }

    @Override
    public long getDelay(TimeUnit unit) {
      throw new UnsupportedOperationException("test should not care about this");
    }

    @Override
    public int compareTo(Delayed other) {
      throw new UnsupportedOperationException("test should not care about this");
    }
  }

import com.google.common.testing.SerializableTester;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Basic reserialization test for collection types that must preserve {@code equals()} behavior when
 * reserialized. (Sets and Lists, but not bare Collections.)
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore // Affects only Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.

   * com.google.common.testing.junit4.TearDownTestCase} for example.
   *
   * <p>A failing {@link TearDown} may or may not fail a tl4j test, depending on the version of
   * JUnit test case you are running under. To avoid failing in the face of an exception regardless
   * of JUnit version, implement a {@link SloppyTearDown} instead.
   *
   * <p>tl4j details: For backwards compatibility, {@code junit3.TearDownTestCase} currently does

           * well be a JDK bug.
           */
          || info.getName().contains("TypeTokenTest")
      /*
       * Luckily, we don't care about analyzing tests at all. We'd skip them all if we could do so
       * trivially, but it's enough to skip these ones.
       */
      ) {
        continue;
      }
      Class<?> clazz = info.load();
      try {

           * well be a JDK bug.
           */
          || info.getName().contains("TypeTokenTest")
      /*
       * Luckily, we don't care about analyzing tests at all. We'd skip them all if we could do so
       * trivially, but it's enough to skip these ones.
       */
      ) {
        continue;
      }
      Class<?> clazz = info.load();
      try {

      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.

        // Exactly 1 colon. Split into host:port.
        host = hostPortString.substring(0, colonPos);
        portString = hostPortString.substring(colonPos + 1);
      } else {
        // 0 or 2+ colons. Bare hostname or IPv6 literal.
        host = hostPortString;
        hasBracketlessColons = (colonPos >= 0);
      }
    }

    int port = NO_PORT;
    if (!Strings.isNullOrEmpty(portString)) {

 * that they are safe for concurrent use, but if other threads modify the map after the iterator is
 * created, it is undefined which of these changes, if any, are reflected in that iterator. These
 * iterators never throw {@link ConcurrentModificationException}.
 *
 * <p>If {@link #weakKeys} or {@link #weakValues} are requested, it is possible for a key or value

   * Determines whether a character is a BMP digit according to <a
   * href="http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/list-unicodeset.jsp?a=%5Cp%7Bdigit%7D">Unicode</a>. If
   * you only care to match ASCII digits, you can use {@code inRange('0', '9')}.
   *
   * @deprecated Many digits are supplementary characters; see the class documentation.
   * @since 19.0 (since 1.0 as constant {@code DIGIT})
   */
  @Deprecated
  public static CharMatcher digit() {

   * of this method requires a corresponding call to {@link #maximumWeight(long)} prior to calling
   * {@link #build}. Weights are measured and recorded when entries are inserted into the cache, and
   * are thus effectively static during the lifetime of a cache entry.
   *
   * <p>When the weight of an entry is zero it will not be considered for size-based eviction