* decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid
   * creating a lot of compile errors that users would not find to be informative, we're giving in
   * and allowing callers to pass arguments that a nullness checker believes could be null.
   *

    } catch (Exception e) { // sneaky checked exception
      // Log it and keep going -- bad runnable and/or executor. Don't punish the other runnables if
      // we're given a bad one. We only catch Exception because we want Errors to propagate up.
      log.get()
          .log(
              Level.SEVERE,
              "RuntimeException while executing runnable "
                  + runnable
                  + " with executor "

    } catch (Exception e) { // sneaky checked exception
      // Log it and keep going -- bad runnable and/or executor. Don't punish the other runnables if
      // we're given a bad one. We only catch Exception because we want Errors to propagate up.
      log.get()
          .log(
              Level.SEVERE,
              "RuntimeException while executing runnable "
                  + runnable
                  + " with executor "

   * </ol>
   *
   * <p>{@code RuntimeException}s thrown by tasks are simply logged and the executor keeps trucking.
   * If an {@code Error} is thrown, the error will propagate and execution will stop until the next
   * time a task is submitted.
   *
   * <p>When an {@code Error} is thrown by an executed task, previously submitted tasks may never

        return (Comparator) Ordering.natural().reverse();
      } else {
        return reverse(forwardComparator);
      }
    }

    // If we inline this, we get a javac error.
    private static <T extends @Nullable Object> Ordering<T> reverse(Comparator<T> forward) {
      return Ordering.from(forward).reverse();
    }

    @Override
    @ParametricNullness

 * used; or if the class exposes a public parameter-less constructor then it will be "new"d and
 * returned.
 *
 * <p>All default instances returned by {@link #get} are generics-safe. Clients won't get type
 * errors for using {@code get(Comparator.class)} as a {@code Comparator<Foo>}, for example.
 * Immutable empty instances are returned for collection types; {@code ""} for string; {@code 0} for

 * used; or if the class exposes a public parameter-less constructor then it will be "new"d and
 * returned.
 *
 * <p>All default instances returned by {@link #get} are generics-safe. Clients won't get type
 * errors for using {@code get(Comparator.class)} as a {@code Comparator<Foo>}, for example.
 * Immutable empty instances are returned for collection types; {@code ""} for string; {@code 0} for

          forwardCmp = (Comparator) Ordering.natural();
        }
        result = comparator = reverse(forwardCmp);
      }
      return result;
    }

    // If we inline this, we get a javac error.
    private static <T extends @Nullable Object> Ordering<T> reverse(Comparator<T> forward) {
      return Ordering.from(forward).reverse();
    }

    @Override
    @ParametricNullness

            the module description of only the prod module. And the prod module doesn't inherit all
            the modules that the test module classes use, so we get errors.

            The good news is that, despite ignoring errors here, GWT does fail if any errors affect
            classes that are actually used in the module under test.

            One way to eliminate the warnings is to make base.testModule include the not really

  @SuppressWarnings({"AndroidJdkLibsChecker", "Java7ApiChecker"})
  @IgnoreJRERequirement // helper for toImmutableSortedMultiset
  /*
   * If we make these calls inline inside toImmutableSortedMultiset, we get an Animal Sniffer error,
   * despite the @IgnoreJRERequirement annotation there. My assumption is that, because javac
   * generates a synthetic method for the body of the lambda, the actual method calls that Animal