// This is used by the ClassLoader-leak test in FinalizableReferenceQueueTest to disable
    // finding Finalizer on the system class path even if it is there.
    @VisibleForTesting static boolean disabled;

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public Class<?> loadFinalizer() {
      if (disabled) {
        return null;
      }
      ClassLoader systemLoader;
      try {

    // This is used by the ClassLoader-leak test in FinalizableReferenceQueueTest to disable
    // finding Finalizer on the system class path even if it is there.
    @VisibleForTesting static boolean disabled;

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public Class<?> loadFinalizer() {
      if (disabled) {
        return null;
      }
      ClassLoader systemLoader;
      try {

 * creating the factory. The currently available policies are:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>DISABLED
 *   <li>WARN
 *   <li>THROW
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The locks created by a factory instance will detect lock acquisition cycles with locks created
 * by other {@code CycleDetectingLockFactory} instances (except those with {@code Policy.DISABLED}).
 * A lock's behavior when a cycle is detected, however, is defined by the {@code Policy} of the

    assertNotSame(frqC, sepFrqC);

    Class<?> sepFrqSystemLoaderC =
        sepLoader.loadClass(FinalizableReferenceQueue.SystemLoader.class.getName());
    Field disabled = sepFrqSystemLoaderC.getDeclaredField("disabled");
    disabled.setAccessible(true);
    disabled.set(null, true);

    Class<?> frqUserC = FrqUser.class;
    Class<?> sepFrqUserC = sepLoader.loadClass(frqUserC.getName());
    assertNotSame(frqUserC, sepFrqUserC);

    assertNotSame(frqC, sepFrqC);

    Class<?> sepFrqSystemLoaderC =
        sepLoader.loadClass(FinalizableReferenceQueue.SystemLoader.class.getName());
    Field disabled = sepFrqSystemLoaderC.getDeclaredField("disabled");
    disabled.setAccessible(true);
    disabled.set(null, true);

    Class<?> frqUserC = FrqUser.class;
    Class<?> sepFrqUserC = sepLoader.loadClass(frqUserC.getName());
    assertNotSame(frqUserC, sepFrqUserC);

   * @throws ArithmeticException if {@code mode} is {@link RoundingMode#UNNECESSARY} and {@code x}
   *     is not a power of two
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("fallthrough")
  // TODO(kevinb): remove after this warning is disabled globally
  public static int log2(long x, RoundingMode mode) {
    checkPositive("x", x);
    switch (mode) {
      case UNNECESSARY:
        checkRoundingUnnecessary(isPowerOfTwo(x));
        // fall through

   *
   * @throws NullPointerException if any element is null
   * @since 3.0 (source-compatible since 2.0)
   */
  @SafeVarargs // For Eclipse. For internal javac we have disabled this pointless type of warning.
  public static <E> ImmutableList<E> of(
      E e1, E e2, E e3, E e4, E e5, E e6, E e7, E e8, E e9, E e10, E e11, E e12, E... others) {
    checkArgument(

     * allowed. But at the same time, it seems wasteful to bother inserting the checkNotNull calls
     * that NullPointerTester wants.
     *
     * (This empty method disables the automatic null testing provided by PackageSanityTests.)
     */
  }

          <show>package</show>
        </configuration>
      </plugin>
      <!-- Disable "normal" testing, which doesn't work for GWT tests. -->
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <skip>true</skip>
        </configuration>

   * @throws ArithmeticException if {@code mode} is {@link RoundingMode#UNNECESSARY} and {@code x}
   *     is not a power of two
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("fallthrough")
  // TODO(kevinb): remove after this warning is disabled globally
  public static int log2(int x, RoundingMode mode) {
    checkPositive("x", x);
    switch (mode) {
      case UNNECESSARY:
        checkRoundingUnnecessary(isPowerOfTwo(x));
        // fall through