return repository.isOverride(method)
    }

    Violation acceptOrReject(JApiCompatibility member, Violation rejection) {
        List<String> changes = member.compatibilityChanges.collect { Violation.describe(it) }
        return acceptOrReject(member, changes, rejection)
    }

    Violation acceptOrReject(JApiCompatibility member, List<String> changes, Violation rejection) {

## Decision

We do not use Java serialization. Instead, we use custom serialization where we explicitly describe how data objects should be serialized and deserialized.

For internal purposes, we use binary formats for their brevity.
We use the `Serializer` abstraction to separate the actual implementation of serialization from its uses.

        - Typo (please open a PR instead)
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: description
    attributes:
      label: Problem description
      description: |
        Please describe the problem as concisely as possible.
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |

Java serialization does not enforce type safety as strictly as some alternatives, potentially leading to runtime errors.

## Decision

We do not use Java serialization.
Instead, we use custom serialization where we explicitly describe how data objects should be serialized and deserialized.

For internal purposes, we use binary formats for their brevity.
We use the `Serializer` abstraction to separate the actual implementation of serialization from its uses.

## Decision

The *Build Tool Team* has decided to use Architectural Decision Records (aka ADR) to track decisions we want to follow.

The main logic with ADRs is to describe (architectural) decisions made:

* To provide best practices and solutions we (as *build tool* team) want to promote.
* To avoid asking the same thing multiple times during code review.

## Decision

The *Build Tool Team* has decided to use Architectural Decision Records (aka ADR) to track decisions we want to follow.

The main logic with ADRs is to describe (architectural) decisions made:

* To provide best practices and solutions we (as the *build tool* team) want to promote.
* To avoid asking the same thing multiple times during code review.

The report will explain the errors in detail.
Perhaps, you forgot to add an `@Incubating` annotation or `@since` in the javadoc.

2. Accept the changes.\
If you are sure that the changes are intentional, follow the steps described in the report.
This includes adding the description of the changes to the `accepted-public-api-changes.json` file, and providing a reason for each change.
You can add the changes to any place in the file, e.g. at the top.