@Deprecated
public interface ArtifactFilterManager {
    /**
     * Returns a filter for core + extension artifacts.
     *
     * @return the artifact filter
     * @deprecated use {@code META-INF/maven/extension.xml} to define artifacts exported by Maven core and plugin
     *             extensions.
     */
    ArtifactFilter getArtifactFilter();

    /**
     * Returns a filter for only the core artifacts.
     *

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven;

import java.util.Set;

/**
 * @deprecated use {@code META-INF/maven/extension.xml} to define artifacts exported by Maven core extensions.
 */
@Deprecated
public interface ArtifactFilterManagerDelegate {

    void addExcludes(Set<String> excludes);

    void addCoreExcludes(Set<String> excludes);

import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Java 5 annotation for describing service layer security attributes.
 *
 * <p>
 * The <code>Secured</code> annotation is used to define a list of security configuration
 * attributes for business methods.
 * <p>
 * For example:
 *
 * <pre>
 * &#064;Secured({ &quot;ROLE_USER&quot; })
 * public void create(Contact contact);
 *

     * a given entry might not include null. The right fix for the header problems is probably to
     * define a separate MultimapLink interface with a separate "header" implementation, which
     * hopefully could avoid implementing Entry or ValueSetLink at all. (But note that that approach
     * requires us to define extra classes -- unfortunate under Android.) *Then* we could consider

    // vol. 2, Knuth, 4.2.2, (16) to the two-variable case. We have two value series x_i and y_i.
    // We define the arithmetic means X_n = 1/n \sum_{i=1}^n x_i, and Y_n = 1/n \sum_{i=1}^n y_i.
    // We also define the sum of the products of the differences from the means
    //           C_n = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i - n X_n Y_n
    // for all n >= 1. Then for all n > 1:

                .collect(Collectors.toList());

        if (!unversionedPlugins.isEmpty()) {
            logger.warn("Version not locked for default bindings plugins " + unversionedPlugins
                    + ", you should define versions in pluginManagement section of your " + "pom.xml or parent");
        }

        return executionPlan;
    }

    public void handleBuildError(
            final ReactorContext buildContext,

    return requireLinks()[i];
  }

  private void setLink(int i, long value) {
    requireLinks()[i] = value;
  }

  /*
   * We don't define getPredecessor+getSuccessor and setPredecessor+setSuccessor here because
   * they're defined above -- including logic to add and subtract 1 to map between the values stored
   * in the predecessor/successor arrays and the indexes in the elements array that they identify.
   */

    return requireNonNull(predecessor);
  }

  private int[] requireSuccessors() {
    return requireNonNull(successor);
  }

  /*
   * We don't define getPredecessor+getSuccessor and setPredecessor+setSuccessor here because
   * they're defined above -- including logic to add and subtract 1 to map between the values stored
   * in the predecessor/successor arrays and the indexes in the elements array that they identify.
   */

   * first decrementing to zero, and then removing. putIfAbsent or replace could observe the
   * intermediate zero-state. Ways we could deal with this are:
   *
   * - Don't define any of the ConcurrentMap operations. This is the current state of affairs.
   *
   * - Define putIfAbsent and replace as treating zero and absent identically (as currently
   *   implemented below). This is a bit surprising with putIfAbsent, which really becomes

 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.repository.metadata;

import org.apache.maven.artifact.ArtifactScopeEnum;

/**
 * metadata graph edge - combination of version, scope and depth define
 * an edge in the graph
 *
 *
 */
@Deprecated
public class MetadataGraphEdge {
    String version;
    ArtifactScopeEnum scope;
    int depth = -1;
    int pomOrder = -1;
    boolean resolved = true;