String mvnName = jenkinsEnv.mvnFromVersion(buildOs, buildMvn)
            try {
                withEnv(["JAVA_HOME=${ tool "$jdkName" }",
                         "PATH+MAVEN=${ tool "$jdkName" }/bin:${tool "$mvnName"}/bin",
                         "MAVEN_OPTS=-Xms2g -Xmx4g -Djava.awt.headless=true"]) {                   

    assertTrue(Iterators.all(list.iterator(), predicate));
    list.add("pants");
    assertFalse(Iterators.all(list.iterator(), predicate));
  }

  public void testFind_firstElement() {
    Iterable<String> list = Lists.newArrayList("cool", "pants");
    Iterator<String> iterator = list.iterator();
    assertEquals("cool", Iterators.find(iterator, Predicates.equalTo("cool")));
    assertEquals("pants", iterator.next());
  }

                    toRet.add(fact.createToolchain(tm));
                }
            }

            // add default toolchain
            ToolchainPrivate tool = fact.createDefaultToolchain();
            if (tool != null) {
                toRet.add(tool);
            }
        }

        return toRet.toArray(new ToolchainPrivate[0]);
    }

    @Override

    "pydantic-extra-types >=2.0.0",
]

[tool.hatch.version]
path = "fastapi/__init__.py"

[tool.mypy]
strict = true

[[tool.mypy.overrides]]
module = "fastapi.concurrency"
warn_unused_ignores = false
ignore_missing_imports = true

[[tool.mypy.overrides]]
module = "fastapi.tests.*"
ignore_missing_imports = true
check_untyped_defs = true

[[tool.mypy.overrides]]
module = "docs_src.*"

Konkret geht es darum, Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI miteinander zu vergleichen (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

* **Uvicorn**: ein ASGI-Server
    * **Starlette**: (verwendet Uvicorn) ein Web-Mikroframework

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server
    * **Starlette**: (uses Uvicorn) a web microframework

    Iterable<String> list = newArrayList("cool", "pants");
    assertEquals("cool", Iterables.find(list, Predicates.equalTo("cool")));
    assertEquals("pants", Iterables.find(list, Predicates.equalTo("pants")));
    try {
      Iterables.find(list, Predicates.alwaysFalse());
      fail();
    } catch (NoSuchElementException e) {
    }
    assertEquals("cool", Iterables.find(list, Predicates.alwaysTrue()));

# Run go tool dist to install a command.
# The -v causes dist to print the name of each directory as it runs.
# The -vv causes dist to print each build command as it runs.
# go tool dist clean cleans all directories, not just this one,
# but it's as close as we can get.

# Default target (first).
install:
	go tool dist install -v

verbose:
	go tool dist install -vv

clean:

     *
     * @param option the Java tools option for this path, or {@code null} if none
     */
    JavaPathType(String option) {
        this.option = option;
    }

    @Override
    public String id() {
        return name();
    }

    /**
     * Returns the name of the tool option for this path. For example, if this path type

        if (Files.isDirectory(bin)) {
            if (Os.IS_WINDOWS) {
                Path tool = bin.resolve(toolName + ".exe");
                if (Files.exists(tool)) {
                    return tool;
                }
            }
            Path tool = bin.resolve(toolName);
            if (Files.exists(tool)) {
                return tool;
            }
        }
        return null;
    }