<version>1.0.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
      <artifactId>listenablefuture</artifactId>
      <version>9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.code.findbugs</groupId>
      <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>

    ImmutableMultimap.Builder<Character, Character> graphMapBuilder = ImmutableMultimap.builder();
    for (String edge : edges) {
      checkArgument(
          edge.length() == 2, "Expecting each edge to consist of 2 characters but got %s", edge);
      char node1 = edge.charAt(0);
      char node2 = edge.charAt(1);
      graphMapBuilder.put(node1, node2);
      if (!directed) {
        graphMapBuilder.put(node2, node1);

    while (itr.hasNext()) {
      Entry<K, V> entry = itr.next();
      K k = entry.getKey();
      V v = entry.getValue();
      K conflict = inverse.delegate.putIfAbsent(v, k);
      if (conflict != null) {
        broken = entry;
        // We're definitely going to throw, but we'll try to keep the BiMap in an internally
        // consistent state by removing the bad entry.

     * platforms we target.
     *
     * 2. Kotlin's Map type has a getOrDefault method that accepts and returns a "plain V," in
     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls

    /**
     * Returns true if this reference contains an active value, meaning one that is still considered
     * present in the cache. Active values consist of live values, which are returned by cache
     * lookups, and dead values, which have been evicted but awaiting removal. Non-active values
     * consist strictly of loading values, though during refresh a value may be both active and
     * loading.
     */
    boolean isActive();
  }

   *     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(
      "Available in GWT! Annotation is to avoid conflict with GWT specialization of base class.")
  public static float min(float... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    float min = array[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {

    lock03 = factory3.newReentrantLock(OtherOrder.THIRD);
  }

  // In the unittest, create each ordered factory with its own set of lock
  // graph nodes (as opposed to using the static per-Enum map) to avoid
  // conflicts across different test runs.
  private <E extends Enum<E>>
      CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E> newInstanceWithExplicitOrdering(
          Class<E> enumClass, Policy policy) {

      <version>1.0.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
      <artifactId>listenablefuture</artifactId>
      <version>9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.code.findbugs</groupId>
      <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>

   *     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(
      "Available in GWT! Annotation is to avoid conflict with GWT specialization of base class.")
  public static double min(double... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    double min = array[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {

   *     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(
      "Available in GWT! Annotation is to avoid conflict with GWT specialization of base class.")
  public static int min(int... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    int min = array[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
      if (array[i] < min) {