}

  /** Confirm that get() returns a List implementing RandomAccess. */
  public void testGetRandomAccess() {
    Multimap<String, Integer> multimap = create();
    multimap.put("foo", 1);
    multimap.put("foo", 3);
    assertTrue(multimap.get("foo") instanceof RandomAccess);
    assertTrue(multimap.get("bar") instanceof RandomAccess);
  }

  }

  /** Confirm that get() returns a List implementing RandomAccess. */
  public void testGetRandomAccess() {
    Multimap<String, Integer> multimap = create();
    multimap.put("foo", 1);
    multimap.put("foo", 3);
    assertTrue(multimap.get("foo") instanceof RandomAccess);
    assertTrue(multimap.get("bar") instanceof RandomAccess);
  }

    suite.addTestSuite(LinkedListMultimapTest.class);
    return suite;
  }

  protected LinkedListMultimap<String, Integer> create() {
    return LinkedListMultimap.create();
  }

  /** Confirm that get() returns a List that doesn't implement RandomAccess. */
  public void testGetRandomAccess() {
    Multimap<String, Integer> multimap = create();
    multimap.put("foo", 1);
    multimap.put("foo", 3);

          BinaryOperator<V> mergeFunction) {
    return CollectCollectors.toImmutableSortedMap(
        comparator, keyFunction, valueFunction, mergeFunction);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(kevinb): Confirm that ImmutableSortedMap is faster to construct and
   * uses less memory than TreeMap; then say so in the class Javadoc.
   */
  private static final Comparator<?> NATURAL_ORDER = Ordering.natural();

    suite.addTestSuite(LinkedListMultimapTest.class);
    return suite;
  }

  protected LinkedListMultimap<String, Integer> create() {
    return LinkedListMultimap.create();
  }

  /** Confirm that get() returns a List that doesn't implement RandomAccess. */
  public void testGetRandomAccess() {
    Multimap<String, Integer> multimap = create();
    multimap.put("foo", 1);
    multimap.put("foo", 3);

                   animal-sniffer. And that would be fine for our -jre builds:
                   If we're building with JDK8, then clearly we're sticking to
                   JDK8 APIs. However, I assume (but did not confirm) that we'd
                   have the same issue with our -android builds, which need
                   animal-sniffer so that they can check that we're sticking to
                   JDK6-like APIs.

   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // concurrency
  static Thread newThread(String name, Runnable runnable) {
    checkNotNull(name);
    checkNotNull(runnable);
    // TODO(b/139726489): Confirm that null is impossible here.
    Thread result = requireNonNull(platformThreadFactory().newThread(runnable));
    try {
      result.setName(name);
    } catch (SecurityException e) {

          BinaryOperator<V> mergeFunction) {
    return CollectCollectors.toImmutableSortedMap(
        comparator, keyFunction, valueFunction, mergeFunction);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(kevinb): Confirm that ImmutableSortedMap is faster to construct and
   * uses less memory than TreeMap; then say so in the class Javadoc.
   */
  private static final Comparator<?> NATURAL_ORDER = Ordering.natural();

     * for the field accesses in MapIteratorCache. This test *has* found other TSAN errors,
     * including in MapRetrievalCache, so I'm not sure why this one is different. I did at least
     * confirm that my change to MapIteratorCache fixes the TSAN error in the (larger) test it was
     * originally reported in.
     */
    for (Future<?> future : futures.build()) {
      future.get();
    }

     * for the field accesses in MapIteratorCache. This test *has* found other TSAN errors,
     * including in MapRetrievalCache, so I'm not sure why this one is different. I did at least
     * confirm that my change to MapIteratorCache fixes the TSAN error in the (larger) test it was
     * originally reported in.
     */
    for (Future<?> future : futures.build()) {
      future.get();
    }