name: Feature Enhancement Request
description: I want to make an existing feature better
labels: ["type=enhancement"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.


        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our

   * If we make these calls inline inside toImmutableSortedMultiset, we get an Animal Sniffer error,
   * despite the @IgnoreJRERequirement annotation there. My assumption is that, because javac
   * generates a synthetic method for the body of the lambda, the actual method calls that Animal
   * Sniffer is flagging don't appear inside toImmutableSortedMultiset but rather inside that
   * synthetic method. By moving those calls to a named method, we're able to apply

name: Feature Addition Request
description: I want to add a new feature
labels: ["type=addition"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.


        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our

        COMMA_SPLITTER.withKeyValueSeparator(":").split("boy:tom,girl:tina,cat:kitty,dog:tommy");

    assertThat(m.keySet()).containsExactly("boy", "girl", "cat", "dog").inOrder();
    assertThat(m)
        .isEqualTo(ImmutableMap.of("boy", "tom", "girl", "tina", "cat", "kitty", "dog", "tommy"));

    // try in a different order
    m = COMMA_SPLITTER.withKeyValueSeparator(":").split("girl:tina,boy:tom,dog:tommy,cat:kitty");

 * always very useful information.
 *
 * <p>On the other hand, a <i>parameter</i> type of {@link ImmutableList} is generally a nuisance to
 * callers. Instead, accept {@link Iterable} and have your method or constructor body pass it to the
 * appropriate {@code copyOf} method itself.
 *
 * <p>Expressing the immutability guarantee directly in the type that user code references is a

 * always very useful information.
 *
 * <p>On the other hand, a <i>parameter</i> type of {@link ImmutableList} is generally a nuisance to
 * callers. Instead, accept {@link Iterable} and have your method or constructor body pass it to the
 * appropriate {@code copyOf} method itself.
 *
 * <p>Expressing the immutability guarantee directly in the type that user code references is a

        COMMA_SPLITTER.withKeyValueSeparator(":").split("boy:tom,girl:tina,cat:kitty,dog:tommy");

    assertThat(m.keySet()).containsExactly("boy", "girl", "cat", "dog").inOrder();
    assertThat(m)
        .isEqualTo(ImmutableMap.of("boy", "tom", "girl", "tina", "cat", "kitty", "dog", "tommy"));

    // try in a different order
    m = COMMA_SPLITTER.withKeyValueSeparator(":").split("girl:tina,boy:tom,dog:tommy,cat:kitty");