// and friends, and that we will eventually expect to see garbage-collected. The assumption
    // is that the ClassLoader of this test is a URLClassLoader, and that it loads FRQ itself
    // rather than delegating to a parent ClassLoader. If this assumption is violated the test will
    // fail and will need to be rewritten.

    Class<?> frqC = FinalizableReferenceQueue.class;

// an object is encrypted using SSE-C or SSE-KMS. Maybe AWS S3
// computes the ETag as MD5 of the encrypted content but there is
// no way to verify this assumption since the encryption happens
// inside AWS S3.
// Therefore, S3 clients must not make any assumption about ETags
// in case of SSE-C or SSE-KMS except that the ETag is well-formed.
//
// To put all of this into a simple rule:
//
//	SSE-S3 : ETag == MD5

	minPartSize               = 1024 * 1024 * 128 // chosen by us to be optimal for HDDs
)

// optimalPartInfo - calculate the optimal part info for a given
// object size.
//
// NOTE: Assumption here is that for any object to be uploaded to any S3 compatible
// object storage it will have the following parameters as constants.
//
//	maxPartsCount - 10000
//	maxMultipartPutObjectSize - 5TiB

   * once hashed to it terminate, as well as in the case where
   * doubling the table causes no thread to hash to it under
   * expanded mask.  We do not try to detect or remove such cells,
   * under the assumption that for long-running instances, observed
   * contention levels will recur, so the cells will eventually be
   * needed again; and for short-lived ones, it does not matter.
   */

  /**

            + "exposed by the superclass implementation. If the implementation has "
            + "changed, the code must be re-inspected to ensure that the "
            + "assumption is still valid.",
        24,
        ReentrantReadWriteLock.class.getMethods().length);
  }

  private enum MyOrder {
    FIRST,
    SECOND,
    THIRD;
  }

  private enum OtherOrder {

            + "exposed by the superclass implementation. If the implementation has "
            + "changed, the code must be re-inspected to ensure that the "
            + "assumption is still valid.",
        24,
        ReentrantReadWriteLock.class.getMethods().length);
  }

  private enum MyOrder {
    FIRST,
    SECOND,
    THIRD;
  }

  private enum OtherOrder {

 * traditional exclusive locks. Although this increases the false positives that the locks detect
 * (i.e. cycles that will not actually result in deadlock), it simplifies the algorithm and
 * implementation considerably. The assumption is that a user of this factory wishes to eliminate
 * any cyclic acquisition ordering.
 *
 * <p><strong>Explicit Lock Acquisition Ordering</strong>
 *

	if uid, f := c.repairedPods[key]; f {
		if uid == pod.UID {
			log.Debugf("Skipping pod, already repaired")
		} else {
			// This is unexpected, bubble up to an error. Might be missing event, or invalid assumption in our code.
			// Either way, we will skip.
			log.Errorf("Skipping pod, already repaired with an unexpected UID %v vs %v", uid, pod.UID)
		}
		return nil
	}
	log.Infof("Repairing pod...")

   *       proxy will be passed to the method. It's possible that the method body expects an
   *       instance method of the passed-in proxy to be of a certain value yet the proxy isn't aware
   *       of the assumption, in which case the equality check before and after serialization will
   *       fail.
   *   <li>If the constructor or factory method takes a parameter that {@link

   * once hashed to it terminate, as well as in the case where
   * doubling the table causes no thread to hash to it under
   * expanded mask.  We do not try to detect or remove such cells,
   * under the assumption that for long-running instances, observed
   * contention levels will recur, so the cells will eventually be
   * needed again; and for short-lived ones, it does not matter.
   */

  /**