"im??imijuf?nah?oy??r&ihsayim?otagan??t&asim!ak??igus?omatik??zak??u&bihcihc!ihsagih??sonuok?ynah????y&ak&aw!.&a&d&ira?notimak??kadih?ma&h&arihs?im??y&a&kaw?tik??oduk???ru&ustakihcan?y??sauy?wa&g&a&dira?zok??orih??konik??yok?zok??e&banat?dawi??i&garustak?jiat?mani??naniak?o&bog?nimik?t&asim?omihs&ah?uk????ugnihs???o!.&a&jos?koasak?m&ay&ako?ust??ihsayah??r&abi?ukawaihsin??wi&aka?nam???e&gakay?kaw??i&gan?h&cu&kasa?otes??sahakat??k&asim?ihsaruk??miin??n&anemuk?ezib??o&hsotas?jnihs?n&amat...

          + "\n"
          + "Nunc quis lacus est. Sed aliquam pretium cursus. Sed eu libero eros. In hac habitasse "
          + "platea dictumst. Pellentesque molestie, nibh nec iaculis luctus, justo sem lobortis "
          + "enim, at feugiat leo magna nec libero. Mauris quis odio eget nisl rutrum cursus nec "
          + "eget augue. Sed nec arcu sem. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.";

  static final ImmutableMap<String, String> TEST_STRINGS =

 * socket option on an IPv6 socket). Yes, it's confusing. Nevertheless, these "mapped" addresses
 * were never supposed to be seen on the wire. That assumption was dropped, some say mistakenly, in
 * later RFCs with the apparent aim of making IPv4-to-IPv6 transition simpler.
 *
 * <p>Technically one <i>can</i> create a 128bit IPv6 address with the wire format of a "mapped"

          + "\n"
          + "Nunc quis lacus est. Sed aliquam pretium cursus. Sed eu libero eros. In hac habitasse "
          + "platea dictumst. Pellentesque molestie, nibh nec iaculis luctus, justo sem lobortis "
          + "enim, at feugiat leo magna nec libero. Mauris quis odio eget nisl rutrum cursus nec "
          + "eget augue. Sed nec arcu sem. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.";

  static final ImmutableMap<String, String> TEST_STRINGS =