* join them.
   *
   * <p>When escaping a String, the following rules apply:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>The alphanumeric characters "a" through "z", "A" through "Z" and "0" through "9" remain
   *       the same.
   *   <li>The unreserved characters ".", "-", "~", and "_" remain the same.
   *   <li>The general delimiters "@" and ":" remain the same.

 * remove) are supported. Null keys and values are supported.
 *
 * <p>{@code containsKey(k)}, {@code put(k, v)} and {@code remove(k)} are all (expected and
 * amortized) constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash
 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far

  /**
   * This classloader disallows AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater and AtomicIntegerFieldUpdate which will
   * prevent us from selecting our {@code SafeAtomicHelper} strategy.
   *
   * <p>Stashing this in a static field avoids loading it over and over again and speeds up test
   * execution significantly.
   */
  private static final ClassLoader NO_ATOMIC_FIELD_UPDATER =

        LinearTransformation.mapping(x1, y1).and(x1 + xDelta, y1 + yDelta);
    assertDiagonalLinearTransformation(transformation, x1, y1, xDelta, yDelta);
  }

  public void testMappingAnd_horizontal() {
    double x1 = 1.2;
    double xDelta = 3.4;
    double y = 5.6;
    LinearTransformation transformation = LinearTransformation.mapping(x1, y).and(x1 + xDelta, y);

        LinearTransformation.mapping(x1, y1).and(x1 + xDelta, y1 + yDelta);
    assertDiagonalLinearTransformation(transformation, x1, y1, xDelta, yDelta);
  }

  public void testMappingAnd_horizontal() {
    double x1 = 1.2;
    double xDelta = 3.4;
    double y = 5.6;
    LinearTransformation transformation = LinearTransformation.mapping(x1, y).and(x1 + xDelta, y);

 * matches the insertion order. All optional operations (adding and removing) are supported. All
 * elements, including {@code null}, are permitted.
 *
 * <p>{@code contains(x)}, {@code add(x)} and {@code remove(x)}, are all (expected and amortized)
 * constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash function doing a

  }

  static double select(int k, double[] array) {
    // This is basically a copy of com.google.math.Rank#select, with a small change in the method
    // signature: we make k 0-based rather than 1-based; and we drop from and to, and always work on
    // the whole array.
    int from = 0;
    int to = array.length - 1;

    while (true) {
      if (to <= from + 1) {
        // Two or less elements left.

  }

  static double select(int k, double[] array) {
    // This is basically a copy of com.google.math.Rank#select, with a small change in the method
    // signature: we make k 0-based rather than 1-based; and we drop from and to, and always work on
    // the whole array.
    int from = 0;
    int to = array.length - 1;

    while (true) {
      if (to <= from + 1) {
        // Two or less elements left.

 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?
 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will
 *       probably require adding the dep to various ACLs, license files, and Proguard

Guava, the best approach is to create an [issue][] (or comment on an existing
issue if there is one) requesting the feature and describing specific use cases
for it.

If the feature has merit, it will go through a thorough process of API design
and review. Any code should come after this.

[APIs]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_programming_interface
[issue]: https://github.com/google/guava/issues