assertEquals(hashCode, hasher.hash().asLong());

    hasher = HASH_FN.newHasher();
    hasher.putBytes(new byte[] {0x01, 0x01, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00});
    assertEquals(hashCode, hasher.hash().asLong());

    hasher = HASH_FN.newHasher();
    hasher.putLong(0x0000000001000101L);
    assertEquals(hashCode, hasher.hash().asLong());

    hasher = HASH_FN.newHasher();
    hasher

   * Future#isDone done}, making {@code AsyncCallable} suitable for asynchronous derivations.
   *
   * <p>Throwing an exception from this method is equivalent to returning a failing {@link
   * ListenableFuture}.
   */
  ListenableFuture<V> call() throws Exception;

   * Future} need not be {@linkplain Future#isDone done}, making {@code AsyncFunction} suitable for
   * asynchronous derivations.
   *
   * <p>Throwing an exception from this method is equivalent to returning a failing {@code Future}.
   */
  ListenableFuture<O> apply(@ParametricNullness I input) throws Exception;

 *
 * <p>Multimaps are commonly used in places where a {@code Map<K, Collection<V>>} would otherwise
 * have appeared. The differences include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>There is no need to populate an empty collection before adding an entry with {@link #put
 *       put}.
 *   <li>{@code get} never returns {@code null}, only an empty collection.
 *   <li>A key is contained in the multimap if and only if it maps to at least one value. Any

    }
  }

  /** Test equalObjects after adding multiple instances at once with a null */
  public void testAddTwoEqualObjectsAtOnceWithNull() {
    try {
      equalsTester.addEqualityGroup(reference, equalObject1, null);
      fail("Should fail on null equal object");
    } catch (NullPointerException e) {
    }
  }

  /** Test adding null equal object yields error */
  public void testAddNullEqualObject() {

      multimap().putAll(k3(), Lists.newArrayList(null, v3()));
      fail();
    } catch (NullPointerException expected) {
    }

    /*
     * In principle, a Multimap implementation could add e3 first before failing on the null. But
     * that seems unlikely enough to be worth complicating the test over, especially if there's any
     * chance that a permissive test could mask a bug.
     */
    expectUnchanged();

 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
/*
 * The whole thing is really @GwtIncompatible, but GwtJUnitConvertedTestModule doesn't have a
 * parameter for non-GWT, non-test files, and it didn't seem worth adding one for this unusual case.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
final class LenientSerializableTester {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): move this to c.g.c.testing if we allow for c.g.c.annotations dependencies so

   * state: BLOCKED, WAITING, or TIMED_WAITING.
   */
  void waitForThreadToEnterWaitState(Thread thread, long timeoutMillis) {
    long startTime = System.nanoTime();
    for (; ; ) {
      Thread.State s = thread.getState();
      if (s == Thread.State.BLOCKED || s == Thread.State.WAITING || s == Thread.State.TIMED_WAITING)
        return;

 *
 * <p>The {@link #count} and {@link #size} implementations all iterate across the set returned by
 * {@link Multiset#entrySet()}, as do many methods acting on the set returned by {@link
 * #elementSet()}. Override those methods for better performance.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

 * whereToDiffer} produces no observable change in performance. We want to make sure that the array
 * equals implementation is *not* short-circuiting to prevent timing-based attacks. Being fast is
 * only a secondary goal.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
public class HashCodeBenchmark {

  // Use a statically configured random instance for all of the benchmarks