try {
            /* We cannot synchronize (run_thread) here or the caller's
             * thread.wait( timeout ) cannot reaquire the lock and
             * return which would render the timeout effectively useless.
             */
            doConnect();
        } catch( Exception ex ) {
            ex0 = ex; // Defer to below where we're locked
            return;
        } finally {

                doConnect();
            }
        }
        catch ( Exception ex ) {
            ex0 = ex; // Defer to below where we're locked
            return;
        }
        finally {
            synchronized ( run_thread ) {
                if ( run_thread != this.thread ) {
                    /*
                     * Thread no longer the one setup for this transport --

             * parameter words. besides, win98 doesn't return "OptionalSupport" field
             */

            if ( this.wordCount > 2 ) {
                readParameterWordsWireFormat(buffer, bufferIndex + 4);

                /*
                 * The SMB_COM_NT_CREATE_ANDX response wordCount is wrong. There's an

    }

    /// Decrypt a block of bytes.
    public void decrypt( byte[] cipherText, byte[] clearText ) {

        decrypt( cipherText, 0, clearText, 0 );
    }

    /**
     * encrypts an array where the length must be a multiple of 8
     */
    public byte[] encrypt(byte[] clearText) {

        int length = clearText.length;

        if (length % 8 != 0) {

        key = path.substring(0, dr.pathConsumed).toLowerCase();

        /* Samba has a tendency to return referral paths and pathConsumed values
         * in such a way that there can be a slash at the end of the path. This
         * causes problems matching keys in resolve() where an extra slash causes
         * a mismatch. This strips trailing slashes from all keys to eliminate
         * this problem.
         */
        int ki = key.length();

    static String getMessageByCode( int errcode ) {
        /* Note there's a signedness error here because 0xC0000000 based values are
         * negative so it with NT_STATUS_SUCCESS (0) the binary search will not be
         * performed properly. The effect is that the code at index 1 is never found
         * (NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL). So here we factor out NT_STATUS_SUCCESS
         * as a special case (which it is).
         */

 * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307  USA
 */

package jcifs.smb1.smb1;

class TransWaitNamedPipeResponse extends SmbComTransactionResponse {

    // not much to this one is there :~)

    TransWaitNamedPipeResponse() {
    }

    int writeSetupWireFormat( byte[] dst, int dstIndex ) {
        return 0;
    }
    int writeParametersWireFormat( byte[] dst, int dstIndex ) {

 * Google patches: various bugfixes, lastAccess support, retrying requests
 * A proper test suite
 * Various fixes

## Others

### This jcifs or jcifs-ng

jcifs-ng will be a proper choice for many users. 
There are a lot of SMB devices in the world.
Some of them only work with the old jcifs library.
If you want to support many SMB devices, CodeLibs jcifs library will be helpful.

        this.useNTSmbs = th.hasCapability(SmbConstants.CAP_NT_SMBS);
        if ( !this.useNTSmbs ) {
            log.debug("No support for NT SMBs");
        }

        // there seems to be a bug with some servers that causes corruption if using signatures +
        // CAP_LARGE_WRITE
        if ( th.hasCapability(SmbConstants.CAP_LARGE_WRITEX) && !th.areSignaturesActive() ) {

    }


    @Test
    public void testJavaHMAC () throws GeneralSecurityException {
        testJavaHMAC("0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b", "Hi There", "9294727a3638bb1c13f48ef8158bfc9d");
        testJavaHMAC("0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c", "Test With Truncation", "56461ef2342edc00f9bab995690efd4c");
        testJavaHMAC(
            "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",