- type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 1. What are you trying to do?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 2. What's the best code you can write to accomplish that without the new feature?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 3. What would that same code look like if we added your feature?
    validations:

as well say that "I see what I eat" is the same thing as "I eat
what I see"!'

  `You might just as well say,' added the March Hare, `that "I
like what I get" is the same thing as "I get what I like"!'

  `You might just as well say,' added the Dormouse, who seemed to
be talking in his sleep, `that "I breathe when I sleep" is the
same thing as "I sleep when I breathe"!'

 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * The calls to {@link #isSubtype} and {@link #notSubtype} tells the framework what assertions need
 * to be made.
 *
 * <p>The declaration methods must be public.
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // only used by android incompatible tests.
abstract class SubtypeTester implements Cloneable {

  /** Annotates a public method that declares subtype assertion. */
  @RequiredModifiers(Modifier.PUBLIC)

import com.google.caliper.Benchmark;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;

/**
 * Simple benchmark: create, start, read. This does not currently report the most useful result
 * because it's ambiguous to what extent the stopwatch benchmark is being affected by GC.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
public class StopwatchBenchmark {
  @Benchmark
  long stopwatch(int reps) {
    long total = 0;

import com.google.caliper.Benchmark;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;

/**
 * Simple benchmark: create, start, read. This does not currently report the most useful result
 * because it's ambiguous to what extent the stopwatch benchmark is being affected by GC.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
public class StopwatchBenchmark {
  @Benchmark
  long stopwatch(int reps) {
    long total = 0;

  public void testConstraint() {

    /**
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself
     * well-tested. A purist would object to this, but what can I say, we're dirty cheaters.
     */
    map.put(Integer.class, new Integer(5));

  public void testConstraint() {

    /**
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself
     * well-tested. A purist would object to this, but what can I say, we're dirty cheaters.
     */
    map.put(Integer.class, new Integer(5));

code is a library, we strongly recommend using the [Guava Beta Checker] to
ensure that you do not use any `@Beta` APIs!**

[Guava Beta Checker]: https://github.com/google/guava-beta-checker

<!-- References -->

import com.google.common.cache.TestingRemovalListeners.CountingRemovalListener;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests relating to cache eviction: what does and doesn't count toward maximumSize, what happens
 * when maximumSize is reached, etc.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */
public class CacheEvictionTest extends TestCase {
  static final int MAX_SIZE = 100;

 *
 * <p>The view collections of the returned map have <i>weakly consistent iterators</i>. This means
 * that they are safe for concurrent use, but if other threads modify the map after the iterator is
 * created, it is undefined which of these changes, if any, are reflected in that iterator. These
 * iterators never throw {@link ConcurrentModificationException}.
 *