override val name: Name
        get() = withValidityAssertion { descriptor.name }

    // There doesn't seem to be a way to determine if `descriptor` has a body or not, so we return an initializer even for enum entries
    // without a body.
    override val enumEntryInitializer: KtEnumEntryInitializerSymbol?
        get() = this

        /**
         * If we have a property with the same name, avoid dropping qualifiers makes it reference a property with the same name e.g.,
         *    package my.component
         *    class foo { .. }  // A
         *    ..
         *    fun test() {
         *      val foo = ..    // B
         *      my.component.foo::class.java  // If we drop `my.component`, it will reference `B` instead of `A`

     * we need to resolve the whole qualifier to understand which parts of the qualifier are package or class qualifiers.
     * And then we will be able to resolve the qualifier selected by the user to the proper class, package or callable.
     *
     * It's possible that the whole qualifier is invalid, in this case we still want to resolve our [selectedFqName].

        }
        else -> arguments.any { typeProjection ->
            // A star projection type (lazily) built by type parameter will be yet another type with a star projection,
            // resulting in stack overflow if we keep checking allowed type parameter descriptors
            !typeProjection.isStarProjection &&
                    typeProjection.type.hasReferenceOtherThan(allowedTypeParameterDescriptors)
        }
    }
}

        // If we are at a super-type constructor call, adjust the resolution expression so that we
        // get the constructor instead of the class.
        //
        // For the example:
        //
        // class A {
        //   constructor()
        // }
        // class B: <caret>A()
        //

                }
            }
        }

        if (this is FirImplicitInvokeCall) {

            // If we have a PSI expression like `Foo.Bar.Baz()` and try to resolve `Bar` part,
            // and the only FIR that we have for that PSI is an implicit invoke call, that means that
            // `Foo.Bar` is definitely not a property access - otherwise it would have had its own FIR.

        /**
         * Not all expressions appear in the [ControlFlowGraph].
         * Still, if we find at least some of them, it's very unlikely that we will ever find a better graph.
         */
        val firCandidates = buildSet {
            fun addCandidate(firCandidate: FirElement) {
                add(firCandidate)

 * not necessarily the case for declaration providers (e.g. the IDE declaration provider hitting the index without caching).
 *
 * However, since symbol names providers may not be able to compute name sets per their contract, we may have to fall back to the
 * [declaration provider][org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.providers.KotlinDeclarationProvider].
 *

For handy work with compiler tests it's recommended to use [
Kotlin Compiler Test Helper](https://github.com/demiurg906/test-data-helper-plugin)

### Dependency verification

We have a [dependencies verification](https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/dependency_verification.html) feature enabled in the

            // to get the combined scope. A base declared member scope with Java enhancement doesn't exist, unfortunately.
            DeclaredMemberScopeKind.COMBINED -> {
                // The static scope contains inner classes, so we need to exclude them from the non-static scope to avoid duplicates.