* characters.
 *
 * <p>As there are important reasons, including potential security issues, to handle Unicode
 * correctly if you are considering implementing a new escaper you should favor using UnicodeEscaper
 * wherever possible.
 *
 * <p>A {@code UnicodeEscaper} instance is required to be stateless, and safe when used concurrently
 * by multiple threads.
 *
 * <p>Popular escapers are defined as constants in classes like {@link

   * @return a UnicodeEscaper with the same behavior as the given instance
   * @throws NullPointerException if escaper is null
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if escaper is not a UnicodeEscaper or a CharEscaper
   */
  static UnicodeEscaper asUnicodeEscaper(Escaper escaper) {
    checkNotNull(escaper);
    if (escaper instanceof UnicodeEscaper) {
      return (UnicodeEscaper) escaper;

  // Escapes nothing
  private static final UnicodeEscaper NOP_ESCAPER =
      new UnicodeEscaper() {
        @Override
        protected char @Nullable [] escape(int c) {
          return null;
        }
      };

  // Escapes everything except [a-zA-Z0-9]
  private static final UnicodeEscaper SIMPLE_ESCAPER =
      new UnicodeEscaper() {
        @Override
        protected char @Nullable [] escape(int cp) {

  public void testReplacements() throws IOException {
    // In reality this is not a very sensible escaper to have (if you are only
    // escaping elements from a map you would use a ArrayBasedCharEscaper).
    UnicodeEscaper escaper =
        new ArrayBasedUnicodeEscaper(
            SIMPLE_REPLACEMENTS, Character.MIN_VALUE, Character.MAX_CODE_POINT, null) {
          @Override
          protected char[] escapeUnsafe(int c) {

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.escape.CharEscaper;
import com.google.common.escape.Escaper;
import com.google.common.escape.UnicodeEscaper;
import java.io.IOException;
import junit.framework.Assert;

/**
 * Extra assert methods for testing Escaper implementations.
 *
 * @author David Beaumont
 * @since 15.0
 */
@GwtCompatible

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.escape.CharEscaper;
import com.google.common.escape.Escaper;
import com.google.common.escape.UnicodeEscaper;
import java.io.IOException;
import junit.framework.Assert;

/**
 * Extra assert methods for testing Escaper implementations.
 *
 * @author David Beaumont
 * @since 15.0
 */
@GwtCompatible

  // Helper to assert common expected behaviour of uri escapers.
  static void assertBasicUrlEscaper(UnicodeEscaper e) {
    assertBasicUrlEscaperExceptPercent(e);
    // The escape character must always be escaped
    assertEscaping(e, "%25", '%');
  }

  public void testUrlFormParameterEscaper() {
    UnicodeEscaper e = (UnicodeEscaper) urlFormParameterEscaper();
    // Verify that these are the same escaper (as documented)

  // Escapes nothing
  private static final UnicodeEscaper NOP_ESCAPER =
      new UnicodeEscaper() {
        @Override
        protected char @Nullable [] escape(int c) {
          return null;
        }
      };

  // Escapes everything except [a-zA-Z0-9]
  private static final UnicodeEscaper SIMPLE_ESCAPER =
      new UnicodeEscaper() {
        @Override
        protected char @Nullable [] escape(int cp) {

                .put('\uDC00', "<lo>".toCharArray())
                .buildOrThrow());
    UnicodeEscaper unicodeEscaper = Escapers.asUnicodeEscaper(charEscaper);
    EscaperAsserts.assertBasic(unicodeEscaper);
    assertEquals("<hello><hi><lo>", charEscaper.escape("x\uD800\uDC00"));
    assertEquals("<hello><hi><lo>", unicodeEscaper.escape("x\uD800\uDC00"));

    // Test that wrapped escapers acquire good Unicode semantics.

  // Helper to assert common expected behaviour of uri escapers.
  static void assertBasicUrlEscaper(UnicodeEscaper e) {
    assertBasicUrlEscaperExceptPercent(e);
    // The escape character must always be escaped
    assertEscaping(e, "%25", '%');
  }

  public void testUrlFormParameterEscaper() {
    UnicodeEscaper e = (UnicodeEscaper) urlFormParameterEscaper();
    // Verify that these are the same escaper (as documented)