final TypeMetaData type = new TypeMetaData('org.gradle.SomeType')

    def rawTypeForSimpleType() {
        expect:
        type.rawType.signature == 'org.gradle.SomeType'
    }

    def rawTypeForArrayType() {
        type.arrayDimensions = 2

        expect:
        type.rawType.signature == 'org.gradle.SomeType[][]'
    }

    def rawTypeForVarargsType() {
        when:

    def "formats signature"() {
        MethodMetaData method = Mock()
        def parameter = new ParameterMetaData('param')
        def type = new TypeMetaData('org.gradle.SomeType')
        parameter.type = type

        expect:
        parameter.signature == 'org.gradle.SomeType param'
    }

            <title>
                <classname>SomeType</classname>
                <literal>readWriteProperty</literal>
            </title>
            <para>comment</para>
        </section>
        <section id="readOnlyProperty" role="detail">
            <title><classname>SomeType</classname> <literal>readOnlyProperty</literal> (read-only)</title>
            <para>comment</para>

* 🚨 Tránh sử dụng `Optional[SomeType]`
* Thay vào đó ✨ **sử dụng `Union[SomeType, None]`** ✨.

Cả hai là tương đương và bên dưới chúng giống nhau, nhưng tôi sẽ đễ xuất `Union` thay cho `Optional` vì từ "**tùy chọn**" có vẻ ngầm định giá trị là tùy chọn, và nó thực sự có nghĩa rằng "nó có thể là `None`", do đó nó không phải là tùy chọn và nó vẫn được yêu cầu.

Tôi nghĩ `Union[SomeType, None]` là rõ ràng hơn về ý nghĩa của nó.

* 🚨 Avoid using `Optional[SomeType]`
* Instead ✨ **use `Union[SomeType, None]`** ✨.

Both are equivalent and underneath they are the same, but I would recommend `Union` instead of `Optional` because the word "**optional**" would seem to imply that the value is optional, and it actually means "it can be `None`", even if it's not optional and is still required.

I think `Union[SomeType, None]` is more explicit about what it means.

    ```

#### `Union` oder `Optional` verwenden?

Wenn Sie eine Python-Version unterhalb 3.10 verwenden, hier ist mein sehr **subjektiver** Standpunkt dazu:

* 🚨 Vermeiden Sie `Optional[SomeType]`
* Stattdessen ✨ **verwenden Sie `Union[SomeType, None]`** ✨.

* 🚨 `Optional[SomeType]` ব্যবহার এড়িয়ে চলুন।
* এর পরিবর্তে ✨ **`Union[SomeType, None]` ব্যবহার করুন** ✨।

উভয়ই সমতুল্য এবং মূলে একই, কিন্তু আমি `Union`-এর পক্ষে সুপারিশ করব কারণ "**অপশনাল**" শব্দটি মনে হতে পারে যে মানটি ঐচ্ছিক,অথচ এটি আসলে মানে "এটি হতে পারে `None`", এমনকি যদি এটি ঐচ্ছিক না হয়েও আবশ্যিক হয়।

আমি মনে করি `Union[SomeType, None]` এর অর্থ আরও স্পষ্টভাবে প্রকাশ করে।

🚥 👆 ⚙️ 🐍 ⏬ 🔛 3️⃣.1️⃣0️⃣, 📥 💁‍♂ ⚪️➡️ 👇 📶 **🤔** ☝ 🎑:

* 👶 ❎ ⚙️ `Optional[SomeType]`
* ↩️ 👶 **⚙️ `Union[SomeType, None]`** 👶.

👯‍♂️ 🌓 & 🔘 👫 🎏, ✋️ 👤 🔜 👍 `Union` ↩️ `Optional` ↩️ 🔤 "**📦**" 🔜 😑 🔑 👈 💲 📦, & ⚫️ 🤙 ⛓ "⚫️ 💪 `None`", 🚥 ⚫️ 🚫 📦 & ✔.

👤 💭 `Union[SomeType, None]` 🌖 🔑 🔃 ⚫️❔ ⚫️ ⛓.

⚫️ 🔃 🔤 & 📛. ✋️ 👈 🔤 💪 📉 ❔ 👆 & 👆 🤽‍♂ 💭 🔃 📟.

`PushContext` is built up by querying the above layers. For some simple use cases, this is as simple as storing something like `configstore.List(SomeType)`; in this case, the only difference from directly exposing the configstore is to snapshot the current state. In other cases, some pre-computations and indexes are computed to make later accesses efficient.

#### Endpoints