<groupId>junit</groupId>
      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
      <!-- *not* <scope>test</scope>; <scope>compile</scope> is right so that guava-testlib users get junit transitively. -->
      <version>4.13.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <!--
      Do not include Truth in non-test scope! Doing so creates a problematic dependency cycle.
      -->
      <groupId>com.google.truth</groupId>
      <artifactId>truth</artifactId>

      </plugin>
    </plugins>
    <resources>
      <resource>
        <directory>src</directory>
      </resource>
      <!-- src-super is copied to guava-gwt-sources (so that we can strip its @Nullable annotations), so we don't need to list it here. We may want to arrange something similar for test-super someday. -->
      <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Why do we have separate src and src-super directories, anyway? -->
      <resource>

    conflict with the copy of ListenableFuture in guava itself. If users are
    using an older version of Guava or a build system other than Gradle, they
    may see class conflicts. If so, they can solve them by manually excluding
    the listenablefuture artifact or manually forcing their build systems to
    use 9999.0-....
  </description>
  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>

          </tags>

          <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Move this to the parent after making the package-list files available there. -->
          <!-- We add the link ourselves, both so that we can choose Java 9 over the version that -source suggests and so that we can solve the JSR305 problem described below. -->
          <detectJavaApiLink>false</detectJavaApiLink>
          <offlineLinks>

      We could probably have resumed it after https://github.com/google/guava/pull/6664.
      But it's always weird that published poms reference test-only libraries at all, so I'm not in any rush to do so.
      -->
    </dependencies>
  </dependencyManagement>
  <profiles>
    <profile>
        <id>sonatype-oss-release</id>
        <build>
          <plugins>
            <plugin>

  <description>
    Verify that filter definitions are properly merged.
  </description>

  <build>
    <filters>
      <!-- NOTE: The first filter is deliberately defined by the child as well, so should not be added twice -->
      <filter>src/main/filters/child-a.properties</filter>
      <filter>src/main/filters/parent-c.properties</filter>
      <filter>src/main/filters/parent-b.properties</filter>

  <description>
    Test that POM interpolation fully interpolates all properties in data flow chain, i.e. where property
    A depends on property B, and property B depends on property C and so on.
  </description>

  <properties>
    <!--
    NOTE: Both the ordering (i.e. neither ascending nor descending) and the number of properties is crucial to
    exhibit the bug.
    -->

    InternalFutures. Most users will never need to use this artifact. Its
    classes are conceptually a part of Guava, but they're in this separate
    artifact so that Android libraries can use them without pulling in all of
    Guava (just as they can use ListenableFuture by depending on the
    listenablefuture artifact).
  </description>
  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>

          </tags>

          <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Move this to the parent after making the package-list files available there. -->
          <!-- We add the link ourselves, both so that we can choose Java 9 over the version that -source suggests and so that we can solve the JSR305 problem described below. -->
          <detectJavaApiLink>false</detectJavaApiLink>
          <offlineLinks>

      <groupId>junit</groupId>
      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
      <!-- *not* <scope>test</scope>; <scope>compile</scope> is right so that guava-testlib users get junit transitively. -->
      <version>4.13.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <!--
      Do not include Truth in non-test scope! Doing so creates a problematic dependency cycle.
      -->
      <groupId>com.google.truth</groupId>
      <artifactId>truth</artifactId>