+ " and-another-thing=\"\"; normal-thing=foo",
        MediaType.create("text", "plain")
            .withParameter("something", "cr@zy")
            .withParameter("something-else", "crazy with spaces")
            .withParameter("and-another-thing", "")
            .withParameter("normal-thing", "foo")
            .toString());
  }

            + " and-another-thing=\"\"; normal-thing=foo",
        MediaType.create("text", "plain")
            .withParameter("something", "cr@zy")
            .withParameter("something-else", "crazy with spaces")
            .withParameter("and-another-thing", "")
            .withParameter("normal-thing", "foo")
            .toString());
  }

  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // should be safe, but not sure if we can avoid the warning
  public <S extends @Nullable T> Ordering<S> reverse() {
    // ordering.reverse() might be optimized, so let it do its thing
    return ordering.<T>reverse().<@NonNull S>nullsFirst();
  }

  @Override
  public <S extends @Nullable T> Ordering<@Nullable S> nullsFirst() {
    return ordering.<@NonNull S>nullsFirst();
  }

     * crc2 = int2
     * crc3 = int3
     *
     * ...so we set crc0 so that computeForWord(crc0) = -1 and xoring it with the first int
     * gives us the desired result.  computeForWord(0) == 0, so all the others do the right thing.
     */
    private int crc0 = INVERSE_COMPUTE_FOR_WORD_OF_ALL_1S;
    private int crc1 = 0;
    private int crc2 = 0;
    private int crc3 = 0;

    @Override
    protected void process(ByteBuffer bb) {

   * even for funny strings composed by (possibly unmatched, and mostly illegal) surrogate
   * characters. (But doesn't test that they do the right thing - just their consistency).
   */
  private static void assertHashStringWithSurrogatesEquivalence(
      HashFunction hashFunction, Random random) {
    int size = random.nextInt(8) + 1;
    char[] chars = new char[size];

  `I do,' Alice hastily replied; `at least--at least I mean what
I say--that's the same thing, you know.'

  `Not the same thing a bit!' said the Hatter.  `You might just
as well say that "I see what I eat" is the same thing as "I eat
what I see"!'

  `You might just as well say,' added the March Hare, `that "I
like what I get" is the same thing as "I get what I like"!'

import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Variant of {@link SerializableTester} that does not require the reserialized object's class to be
 * identical to the original.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
/*
 * The whole thing is really @GwtIncompatible, but GwtJUnitConvertedTestModule doesn't have a
 * parameter for non-GWT, non-test files, and it didn't seem worth adding one for this unusual case.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)

   * `new Integer` (as we do) instead of `Integer.valueOf`. However, under J2KT, `new Integer`
   * gets translated back to `Integer.valueOf` because that is the only thing J2KT can support. And
   * anyway, it's nice to avoid `Integer.valueOf` because the Android toolchain optimizes multiple
   * `Integer.valueOf` calls into one! So we stick with the deprecated `Integer` constructor.
   */

   * ImmutableList.copyOf} and use that list instead.
   */
  public List<Integer> asList() {
    /*
     * Typically we cache this kind of thing, but much repeated use of this view is a performance
     * anti-pattern anyway. If we cache, then everyone pays a price in memory footprint even if
     * they never use this method.
     */
    return new AsList(this);

    if ((!features.contains(IteratorFeature.SUPPORTS_REMOVE) && removes > 1)
        || (stimuli.length >= 5 && removes > 2)) {
      // removes are the most expensive thing to test, since they often throw exceptions with stack
      // traces, so we test them a bit less aggressively
      return;
    }