<exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

            This will trigger a warning when a user tries to use a Mojo marked as deprecated.
          </description>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>configurator</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <type>String</type>
          <description>
            The configurator type to use when injecting parameter values into this Mojo. The value is normally deduced

   | This will determine whether maven prompts you when it needs input. If set to false,
   | maven will use a sensible default value, perhaps based on some other setting, for
   | the parameter in question.
   |
   | Default: true
  <interactiveMode>true</interactiveMode>
  -->

  <!-- offline
   | Determines whether maven should attempt to connect to the network when executing a build.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

  </description>

  <properties>
    <overridden>PARENT</overridden>
    <!-- Test the effective value of this property in the child when "overridden" is defined by child as well -->
    <interpolated>${overridden}</interpolated>
  </properties>

  <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4053</name>
  <description>
    Verify that attributes in plugin configuration elements are not erroneously duplicated to other elements when
    no plugin management is used.
  </description>

  <build>
    <!-- NOTE: This test does not use plugin management for the IT plugin -->
    <plugins>
      <plugin>