The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

 * Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *
 * <p>This class has limited support for cancellation and other "early completions":
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>While calls to {@code submit} and {@code submitAsync} return a {@code Future} that can be
 *       cancelled, cancellation never propagates to a task that has started to run -- neither to

   * {@code readable}. Note that this method may not fully consume the contents of {@code readable}
   * if the processor stops processing early.
   *
   * @throws IOException if an I/O error occurs
   * @since 14.0
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue // some processors won't return a useful result
  @ParametricNullness

 * API</h2>
 *
 * <p>The successor to Guava's caching API is <a
 * href="https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/wiki">Caffeine</a>. Its API is designed to make it a
 * nearly drop-in replacement. It requires Java 8+, and is not available for Android or GWT/J2CL,
 * and may have <a href="https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/wiki/Guava">different (usually

      Executor executor) {
    return AbstractCatchingFuture.create(input, exceptionType, fallback, executor);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a future that delegates to another but will finish early (via a {@link
   * TimeoutException} wrapped in an {@link ExecutionException}) if the specified duration expires.
   *
   * <p>The delegate future is interrupted and cancelled if it times out.
   *

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.