[later editions continued as follows
    The Panther took pie-crust, and gravy, and meat,
    While the Owl had the dish as its share of the treat.
    When the pie was all finished, the Owl, as a boon,
    Was kindly permitted to pocket the spoon:
    While the Panther received knife and fork with a growl,
    And concluded the banquet--]

   * {@code key} while the new value was loading then a removal notification will be sent for the
   * new value.
   *
   * <p>If the cache loader associated with this cache is known not to throw checked exceptions,
   * then prefer {@link #getUnchecked} over this method.
   *
   * @throws ExecutionException if a checked exception was thrown while loading the value. ({@code

        // try to swap null into head.
      } while (!UNSAFE.compareAndSwapObject(this, HEAD_OFFSET, stack, null));

      RunnableExecutorPair reversedStack = null;
      while (stack != NULL_PAIR) {
        RunnableExecutorPair head = stack;
        stack = stack.next;
        head.next = reversedStack;
        reversedStack = head;
      }
      stack = reversedStack;
      while (stack != null) {
        stack.execute();

 * common bugs: The {@code wait()} must be inside a {@code while} instead of an {@code if}, and
 * {@code notifyAll()} must be used instead of {@code notify()} because there are two different
 * logical conditions being awaited.
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * public class SafeBox<V> {
 *   private V value;
 *
 *   public synchronized V get() throws InterruptedException {
 *     while (value == null) {
 *       wait();
 *     }

    try {
      assertThat(temp.exists()).isTrue();
      assertThat(temp.isDirectory()).isTrue();
      assertThat(temp.listFiles()).isEmpty();
      File child = new File(temp, "child");
      assertThat(child.createNewFile()).isTrue();
      assertThat(child.delete()).isTrue();

      if (!isAndroid() && !isWindows()) {
        PosixFileAttributes attributes =

    assertEquals("com", parent.toString());

    // These would throw an exception if leniency were not preserved during parent() and child()
    // calls.
    InternetDomainName child = parent.child(LOTS_OF_DELTAS);
    InternetDomainName unused = child.child(LOTS_OF_DELTAS);
  }

  public void testValidTopPrivateDomain() {
    InternetDomainName googleDomain = InternetDomainName.from("google.com");

        double partition = array[from + 1]; // Choose partitioning element.
        while (true) {
          // Skip the elements smaller than the partition.
          do {
            low++;
          } while (array[low] < partition);

          // Skip the elements larger than the partition.
          do {
            high--;
          } while (array[high] > partition);
          if (high < low) {

        double partition = array[from + 1]; // Choose partitioning element.
        while (true) {
          // Skip the elements smaller than the partition.
          do {
            low++;
          } while (array[low] < partition);

          // Skip the elements larger than the partition.
          do {
            high--;
          } while (array[high] > partition);
          if (high < low) {

   *
   * @throws ExecutionException if a checked exception was thrown while loading the value
   * @throws UncheckedExecutionException if an unchecked exception was thrown while loading the
   *     value
   * @throws ExecutionError if an error was thrown while loading the value
   * @since 11.0
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue // TODO(b/27479612): consider removing this

 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?