check(type is KtFirType) { "KtFirScopeProvider can only work with KtFirType, but ${type::class} was provided" }
        return getFirTypeScope(type)
            ?.withSyntheticPropertiesScopeOrSelf(type.coneType)
            ?.let { convertToKtTypeScope(it) }
    }

    override fun getSyntheticJavaPropertiesScope(type: KtType): KtTypeScope? {

                    // Implicit lambda parameter doesn't have a source PSI.
                    descriptor.source.getPsi() == null &&
                    // But, that could be the case for a declaration from Library. Double-check the slice in the binding context
                    (descriptor.containingDeclaration.source.getPsi() as? KtFunctionLiteral)?.let { parentLambda ->

        if (classLikeDeclaration is FirRegularClass) {
            if (calleeReference is FirResolvedNamedReference) {
                val callee = calleeReference.resolvedSymbol.fir as? FirCallableDeclaration
                // TODO: check callee owner directly?
                if (callee !is FirConstructor && callee?.isStatic != true) {
                    classLikeDeclaration.companionObjectSymbol?.let { return it.fir.buildSymbol(symbolBuilder) }
                }

### Dependency verification

We have a [dependencies verification](https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/dependency_verification.html) feature enabled in the
repository for all Gradle builds. Gradle will check hashes (md5 and sha256) of used dependencies and will fail builds with
`Dependency verification failed` errors when local artifacts are absent or have different hashes listed in the

    (this as? ConeClassLikeType)?.lookupTag?.toSymbol(session)?.lazyResolveToPhase(FirResolvePhase.STATUS)

    val signatureWriter = BothSignatureWriter(BothSignatureWriter.Mode.SKIP_CHECKS)

    //TODO Check thread safety
    session.jvmTypeMapper.mapType(this, mode, signatureWriter) {
        val containingFile = useSitePosition.containingKtFile
        // parameters for default setters does not have kotlin origin, but setter has

                bindingTrace, resolutionScope, call, TypeUtils.NO_EXPECTED_TYPE, dataFlowInfo,
                ContextDependency.INDEPENDENT, CheckArgumentTypesMode.CHECK_VALUE_ARGUMENTS,
                /* isAnnotationContext = */ false, analysisContext.languageVersionSettings,
                dataFlowValueFactory
            ).replaceCollectAllCandidates(true)

        explicitReceiver: KtExpression?
    ): KtCompletionExtensionCandidateChecker = analysisSession.withValidityAssertion {
        return LazyKtCompletionExtensionCandidateChecker {
            // Double validity check is needed, as the checker may be requested some time later
            analysisSession.withValidityAssertion {
                KtFirCompletionExtensionCandidateChecker(analysisSession, nameExpression, explicitReceiver, originalFile)

# Check-out https://www.jetbrains.com/help/space/code-owners.html#codeowners-file-syntax
# This file is checked by org.jetbrains.kotlin.code.SpaceCodeOwnersTest
# Directive OWNER_LIST specifies possible values for owner field
# Directive UNKNOWN specifies that path is unclaimed
# Ownership must be exhaustive modulo UNKNOWN

# OWNER_LIST: Kotlin
# OWNER_LIST: "Kotlin Libraries"
# OWNER_LIST: "Kotlin JVM" "Kotlin Native" "Kotlin Wasm" "Kotlin Common Backend"

     * a KDoc reference should be considered as legal and resolved, and false otherwise.
     *
     * This is **not** an actual type check, it is just an opinionated approximation.
     * The main guideline was K1 KDoc resolve.
     *
     * This check might change in the future, as Dokka team advances with KDoc rules.
     */

            .asSequence()
            .filter { withImplicitReceivers || it.implicitReceiver == null }
            .flatMap {
                // We must use `it.getAvailableScopes()` instead of `it.scope` to check scopes of companion objects
                // and context receivers as well.
                it.getAvailableScopes()
            }

        val result = buildList {
            addAll(nonLocalScopes)