### Typical Pull Request Workflow -

**1. New PR**

- As a contributor, you submit a New PR on GitHub.
- We inspect every incoming PR and add certain labels to the PR such as `size:`,
  `comp:` etc.  At this stage we check if the PR is valid and meets certain
  quality requirements. For example, we check if the CLA is signed, PR has
  sufficient description, if applicable unit tests are added, if it is a

# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit
  - comment_added

automations:

  javadoc_on_new_files:
    # Triggered for new Java files that lack Javadoc content.
    if:

      - {{ ('javadoc_on_new_files' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ is.java and is.new }}

### Docs

* ✏️ Fix link in `fastapi-cli.md`. PR [#11524](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/11524) by [@svlandeg](https://github.com/svlandeg).

### Internal

* 👥 Update FastAPI People. PR [#11511](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/11511) by [@tiangolo](https://github.com/tiangolo).

## 0.111.0

### Features

# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit
  - comment_added

automations:

  # Also post a comment that lists the best experts for the files that were modified.
  comment_experts:
    if:
      - {{ ('code_experts' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
    run:
      - action: explain-code-experts@v1
        args:

!!! info
    Niestety, nie mogę ślepo ufać PR-om, nawet jeśli mają kilka zatwierdzeń.

    Kilka razy zdarzyło się, że PR-y miały 3, 5 lub więcej zatwierdzeń (prawdopodobnie dlatego, że opis obiecuje rozwiązanie ważnego problemu), ale gdy sam sprawdziłem danego PR-a, okazał się być zbugowany lub nie rozwiązywał problemu, który rzekomo miał rozwiązywać. 😅

# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit

automations:

  summary_table:
    if:
      - {{ is.requested or not pr.author_is_org_member }}
      - {{ author.using_gitstream or not pr.author_is_org_member }}
    run:
      - action: add-comment@v1
        args:
          comment:
            <h3>Change Summary</h3>
            This PR is {{ changes.ratio | round(2) }}% new code.

# within the file.  We keep each automation (or very closely related group of automations) in
# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit

automations:

  # Add the a:documentation label to docs-only changes
  docs_only:
    if:
      - {{ ('misc_labels' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ is.docs }}
    run:
      - action: add-label@v1
        args:
          label: 'a:documentation'

# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit
  - comment_added

automations:

  # Add a label that indicates how many minutes it will take to review the PR and categorizes it
  estimated_time_to_review:
    if:
      - {{ ('estimated_time_to_review' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
    run:
      - action: add-label@v1

# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit
  - comment_added

automations:

  # If a PR contains non-trivial source changes and no tests, add a comment to the PR
  lacks_tests:
    if:
      - {{ ('lacks_tests' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ includes_src_changes }}
      - {{ not (includes_test_changes) }}

# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit
  - comment_added

automations:

  # If someone is a primary author of the files in a change, but NOT the pr author, automatically add them as a reviewer.
  add_usual_expert:
    if:
      - {{ ('add_usual_expert' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ repo | codeExperts(gt=50) | match(branch.author) | nope }}
    run: