- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 1 - 10 of 59 for Potter (0.16 sec)
-
build-logic/binary-compatibility/src/main/groovy/gradlebuild/binarycompatibility/upgrades/UpgradedProperties.java
* * Here we automatically accept the following cases: * - A setter `setX` of an upgraded property is removed * - A boolean `isX` of an upgraded property is removed * - A new getter `getX` is added, where the old getter is a boolean getter `isX` of an upgraded property * - A return type is changed for a getter `getX` of an upgraded property *
Java - Registered: Wed May 01 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Tue Apr 23 08:40:36 GMT 2024 - 6.8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
guava-testlib/src/com/google/common/collect/testing/SampleElements.java
public static class Chars extends SampleElements<Character> { public Chars() { // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering super('b', 'a', 'c', 'd', 'e'); } } public static class Enums extends SampleElements<AnEnum> { public Enums() { // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering super(AnEnum.B, AnEnum.A, AnEnum.C, AnEnum.D, AnEnum.E); } }
Java - Registered: Fri Apr 26 12:43:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Wed Feb 21 16:49:06 GMT 2024 - 4.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava-testlib/src/com/google/common/collect/testing/SampleElements.java
public static class Chars extends SampleElements<Character> { public Chars() { // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering super('b', 'a', 'c', 'd', 'e'); } } public static class Enums extends SampleElements<AnEnum> { public Enums() { // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering super(AnEnum.B, AnEnum.A, AnEnum.C, AnEnum.D, AnEnum.E); } }
Java - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Wed Feb 21 16:49:06 GMT 2024 - 4.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/base/AndroidIncompatible.java
* Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would * suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which * would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with * a more precisely named annotation?
Java - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Jul 07 15:40:13 GMT 2023 - 3.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/math/MathPreconditionsTest.java
} } public void testNulls() { /* * Don't bother testing. All non-primitive parameters are used only to construct error messages. * We never want to pass null for them, so we haven't annotated them to say that null is * allowed. But at the same time, it seems wasteful to bother inserting the checkNotNull calls * that NullPointerTester wants. *
Java - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Mon Oct 10 19:45:10 GMT 2022 - 8.2K bytes - Viewed (0) -
guava-tests/test/com/google/common/collect/FauxveridesTest.java
@Override public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) { if (obj instanceof MethodSignature) { MethodSignature other = (MethodSignature) obj; return name.equals(other.name) && parameterTypes.equals(other.parameterTypes) && typeSignature.equals(other.typeSignature); } return false; } @Override public int hashCode() {
Java - Registered: Fri Apr 19 12:43:09 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Tue Oct 31 16:03:42 GMT 2023 - 9.6K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/collect/FauxveridesTest.java
@Override public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) { if (obj instanceof MethodSignature) { MethodSignature other = (MethodSignature) obj; return name.equals(other.name) && parameterTypes.equals(other.parameterTypes) && typeSignature.equals(other.typeSignature); } return false; } @Override public int hashCode() {
Java - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Tue Oct 31 16:03:42 GMT 2023 - 9.6K bytes - Viewed (0) -
guava-tests/test/com/google/common/base/AndroidIncompatible.java
* Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would * suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which * would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with * a more precisely named annotation?
Java - Registered: Fri Apr 19 12:43:09 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Jul 07 15:40:13 GMT 2023 - 3.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/resolver/filter/AbstractScopeArtifactFilter.java
* under the License. */ package org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.filter; import org.apache.maven.artifact.Artifact; /** * Filter to only retain objects in the given artifactScope or better. * */ abstract class AbstractScopeArtifactFilter implements ArtifactFilter { private boolean compileScope; private boolean runtimeScope; private boolean testScope;
Java - Registered: Sun Apr 28 03:35:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Wed Sep 06 08:39:32 GMT 2023 - 2.7K bytes - Viewed (0) -
maven-api-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/internal/impl/model/DefaultRootLocator.java
// that would happen here should cause the build to fail at a later stage // (when actually parsing the POM) and will lead to a better exception being // displayed to the user, so just bail out and return false. } return false; }
Java - Registered: Sun Apr 28 03:35:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Apr 12 10:50:18 GMT 2024 - 2.5K bytes - Viewed (0)