expected = assertThrows(PotentialDeadlockException.class, () -> lockA.lock());
    checkMessage(expected, "LockB -> LockA", "LockA -> LockB");
    // The causal chain should be cached.
    assertSame(firstException.getCause(), expected.getCause());
    // lockA should work after lockB is released.
    lockB.unlock();
    lockA.lock();
  }

  // Tests transitive deadlock detection.

    expected = assertThrows(PotentialDeadlockException.class, () -> lockA.lock());
    checkMessage(expected, "LockB -> LockA", "LockA -> LockB");
    // The causal chain should be cached.
    assertSame(firstException.getCause(), expected.getCause());
    // lockA should work after lockB is released.
    lockB.unlock();
    lockA.lock();
  }

  // Tests transitive deadlock detection.

 *
 * <pre>
 * Thread1: acquire(LockA) --X acquire(LockB)
 * Thread2: acquire(LockB) --X acquire(LockA)
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>Neither thread will progress because each is waiting for the other. In more complex
 * applications, cycles can arise from interactions among more than 2 locks:
 *
 * <pre>
 * Thread1: acquire(LockA) --X acquire(LockB)
 * Thread2: acquire(LockB) --X acquire(LockC)
 * ...

minkä
minkä
mitä
missä
mistä
mihin
millä
miltä
mille
minä
miksi
mitkä
joka
jonka
jota
jossa
josta
johon
jolla
jolta
jolle
jona
joksi
jotka
joiden
joita
joissa
joista
joihin
joilla
joilta
joille
joina
joiksi
että
ja
jos
koska
kuin
mutta
niin
sekä
sillä
tai
vaan
vai