* ImmutableMultiset_CustomFieldSerializer. But that type has no methods (since it's never actually
 * used). We could probably fix the problem by adding dummy methods to that class, but that is
 * starting to sound harder than taking the superclass approach, which I've been coming to like,
 * anyway, since it doesn't require us to declare dummy methods (though occasionally constructors)
 * and make types non-final.
 */

        .suppressing(parentBuilder.getSuppressedTests())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  /**
   * To avoid infinite recursion, test suites with these marker features won't have derived suites
   * created for them.
   */
  enum NoRecurse implements Feature<Void> {
    SUBMULTISET,
    DESCENDING;

    @Override

        .suppressing(parentBuilder.getSuppressedTests())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  /**
   * To avoid infinite recursion, test suites with these marker features won't have derived suites
   * created for them.
   */
  enum NoRecurse implements Feature<Void> {
    SUBMULTISET,
    DESCENDING;

    @Override

  }

  /**
   * Verifies that {@code method} produces a {@link NullPointerException} or {@link
   * UnsupportedOperationException} when the parameter in position {@code paramIndex} is null. If
   * this parameter is marked nullable, this method does nothing.
   *
   * @param instance the instance to invoke {@code method} on, or null if {@code method} is static
   */

  static final int SAMPLE_MASK = 0xFF;

  /**
   * Compute arrays of valid unicode text, and store it in 3 forms: byte arrays, Strings, and
   * StringBuilders (in a CharSequence[] to make it a little harder for the JVM).
   */
  @BeforeExperiment
  void setUp() {
    final long seed = 99;
    final Random rnd = new Random(seed);
    strings = new String[SAMPLES];
    for (int i = 0; i < SAMPLES; i++) {

 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashSet}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure only depends on a fixed number of arrays; {@code
 * add(x)} operations <i>do not</i> create objects for the garbage collector to deal with, and for

 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashMap}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure places significantly reduced load on the garbage
 * collector by only using a constant number of internal objects.
 *

    byte[] key = fillByteArray(80, 0xaa);
    String data = "Test Using Larger Than Block-Size Key - Hash Key First";

    checkSha1("aa4ae5e15272d00e95705637ce8a3b55ed402112", key, data);
  }

  public void testRfc2202_hmacSha1_case7() {
    byte[] key = fillByteArray(80, 0xaa);
    String data = "Test Using Larger Than Block-Size Key and Larger Than One Block-Size Data";

finger VERY deeply with a knife, it usually bleeds; and she had
never forgotten that, if you drink much from a bottle marked
`poison,' it is almost certain to disagree with you, sooner or
later.

  However, this bottle was NOT marked `poison,' so Alice ventured
to taste it, and finding it very nice, (it had, in fact, a sort
of mixed flavour of cherry-tart, custard, pine-apple, roast

          format(
              "estimated size of spliterator after trySplit (%s) is larger than original size (%s)",
              spliterator.estimateSize(), originalSize));
    }
    if (trySplit != null) {
      if (trySplit.estimateSize() > originalSize) {
        fail(
            format(
                "estimated size of trySplit result (%s) is larger than original size (%s)",
                trySplit.estimateSize(), originalSize));