}

    @Test
    void testMailingListsAreInheritedButNotAggregated() throws Exception {
        PomTestWrapper pom = buildPom("mailing-lists-inheritance/child-2");
        assertEquals(1, ((List<?>) pom.getValue("mailingLists")).size());
        assertEquals("child-mailing-list", pom.getValue("mailingLists[1]/name"));
    }

    @Test
    void testPluginInheritanceOrder() throws Exception {

                }
              });
      thread.start();
      // we want to wait until each thread is WAITING - one thread waiting inside CacheLoader.load
      // (in startSignal.await()), and the others waiting for that thread's result.
      while (thread.isAlive() && thread.getState() != Thread.State.WAITING) {
        Thread.yield();
      }
    }
    gettersStartedSignal.countDown();
    gettersComplete.await();

    assertEquals("b", consumingIterator.next());
    assertThat(list).isEmpty();

    assertFalse(consumingIterator.hasNext());
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // ?
  // TODO: Figure out why this is failing in GWT.
  public void testConsumingIterator_duelingIterators() {
    // Test data
    List<String> list = Lists.newArrayList("a", "b");

    // Test & Verify

            // invokeAll method, so that whenever the method is called,
            // the pool core size will be incremented before submitting
            // all the tasks, then the thread will block waiting for all
            // those subtasks to finish.
            // This ensures the number of running workers is no more than
            // the defined parallism, while making sure the pool will not
            // be exhausted

                }
              });
      thread.start();
      // we want to wait until each thread is WAITING - one thread waiting inside CacheLoader.load
      // (in startSignal.await()), and the others waiting for that thread's result.
      while (thread.isAlive() && thread.getState() != Thread.State.WAITING) {
        Thread.yield();
      }
    }
    gettersStartedSignal.countDown();
    gettersComplete.await();

   * nodes. This is an O(n) operation in the common case (and O(n^2) in the worst), but we are saved
   * by two things.
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>This is only called when a waiting thread times out or is interrupted. Both of which
   *       should be rare.
   *   <li>The waiters list should be very short.
   * </ul>
   */
  private void removeWaiter(Waiter node) {

                            timeout = resp.getExpiration() - System.currentTimeMillis();
                            if ( timeout <= 0 ) {
                                throw new TransportException(this + " timedout waiting for response to " + req);
                            }
                        }
                        else {
                            resp.wait();
                            if ( log.isTraceEnabled() ) {

    assertEquals("b", consumingIterator.next());
    assertThat(list).isEmpty();

    assertFalse(consumingIterator.hasNext());
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // ?
  // TODO: Figure out why this is failing in GWT.
  public void testConsumingIterator_duelingIterators() {
    // Test data
    List<String> list = Lists.newArrayList("a", "b");

    // Test & Verify

  /**
   * Returns the result of calling {@link Future#get()} uninterruptibly on a task known not to throw
   * a checked exception. This makes {@code Future} more suitable for lightweight, fast-running
   * tasks that, barring bugs in the code, will not fail. This gives it exception-handling behavior
   * similar to that of {@code ForkJoinTask.join}.
   *
   * <p>Exceptions from {@code Future.get} are treated as follows:
   *
   * <ul>