### Typical Pull Request Workflow -

**1. New PR**

- As a contributor, you submit a New PR on GitHub.
- We inspect every incoming PR and add certain labels to the PR such as `size:`,
  `comp:` etc.  At this stage we check if the PR is valid and meets certain
  quality requirements. For example, we check if the CLA is signed, PR has
  sufficient description, if applicable unit tests are added, if it is a

# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit
  - comment_added

automations:

  javadoc_on_new_files:
    # Triggered for new Java files that lack Javadoc content.
    if:

      - {{ ('javadoc_on_new_files' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ is.java and is.new }}

### Docs

* ✏️ Fix link in `fastapi-cli.md`. PR [#11524](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/11524) by [@svlandeg](https://github.com/svlandeg).

### Internal

* 👥 Update FastAPI People. PR [#11511](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/11511) by [@tiangolo](https://github.com/tiangolo).

## 0.111.0

### Features

# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit
  - comment_added

automations:

  # Also post a comment that lists the best experts for the files that were modified.
  comment_experts:
    if:
      - {{ ('code_experts' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
    run:
      - action: explain-code-experts@v1
        args:

!!! info
    Niestety, nie mogę ślepo ufać PR-om, nawet jeśli mają kilka zatwierdzeń.

    Kilka razy zdarzyło się, że PR-y miały 3, 5 lub więcej zatwierdzeń (prawdopodobnie dlatego, że opis obiecuje rozwiązanie ważnego problemu), ale gdy sam sprawdziłem danego PR-a, okazał się być zbugowany lub nie rozwiązywał problemu, który rzekomo miał rozwiązywać. 😅

- Don’t change public API lightly, avoid if possible, and include your reasoning in the PR if essential.  It causes pain for developers who use OkHttp and sometimes runtime errors.
- Favour a working external library if appropriate.  There are many examples of OkHttp libraries that can sit on top or hook in via existing APIs.
- Get working code on a personal branch with tests before you submit a PR.

To regenerate the manifests, run:

```bash
$ make copy-templates update-golden
```

## Step 5. Create a PR using outputs from Steps 1 to 4

# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit

automations:

  summary_table:
    if:
      - {{ is.requested or not pr.author_is_org_member }}
      - {{ author.using_gitstream or not pr.author_is_org_member }}
    run:
      - action: add-comment@v1
        args:
          comment:
            <h3>Change Summary</h3>
            This PR is {{ changes.ratio | round(2) }}% new code.

-->

#### What this PR does / why we need it:

#### Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
<!--
*Automatically closes linked issue when PR is merged.
Usage: `Fixes #<issue number>`, or `Fixes (paste link of issue)`.
_If PR is about `failing-tests or flakes`, please post the related issues/tests in a comment and do not use `Fixes`_*
-->
Fixes #

#### Special notes for your reviewer:

#### Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

# within the file.  We keep each automation (or very closely related group of automations) in
# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit

automations:

  # Add the a:documentation label to docs-only changes
  docs_only:
    if:
      - {{ ('misc_labels' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ is.docs }}
    run:
      - action: add-label@v1
        args:
          label: 'a:documentation'