blank field (a field named <code>_</code>) somehow has a
      non-zero value.
      These changes make <code>IsZero</code> consistent with comparing
      a value to zero using the language <code>==</code> operator.
    </p>

    <p><!-- https://go.dev/issue/59599, CL 511035 -->
      The <a href="/pkg/reflect/#PtrTo"><code>PtrTo</code></a> function is deprecated,

var bb = make([]byte, 1.0<<s)  // 1.0 has type int; len(bb) == 0
</pre>

<h4 id="Operator_precedence">Operator precedence</h4>
<p>
Unary operators have the highest precedence.
As the  <code>++</code> and <code>--</code> operators form
statements, not expressions, they fall
outside the operator hierarchy.
As a consequence, statement <code>*p++</code> is the same as <code>(*p)++</code>.
</p>

<p>

var bb = make([]byte, 1.0<<s)  // 1.0 has type int; len(bb) == 0
</pre>

<h4 id="Operator_precedence">Operator precedence</h4>
<p>
Unary operators have the highest precedence.
As the  <code>++</code> and <code>--</code> operators form
statements, not expressions, they fall
outside the operator hierarchy.
As a consequence, statement <code>*p++</code> is the same as <code>(*p)++</code>.
</p>
<p>

<p>
Although the assembler takes its guidance from the Plan 9 assemblers,
it is a distinct program, so there are some differences.
One is in constant evaluation.
Constant expressions in the assembler are parsed using Go's operator
precedence, not the C-like precedence of the original.
Thus <code>3&amp;1&lt;&lt;2</code> is 4, not 0—it parses as <code>(3&amp;1)&lt;&lt;2</code>
not <code>3&amp;(1&lt;&lt;2)</code>.