* annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which

          return classify(Ints.compare(left, right));
        }

        @Override
        public ComparisonChain compare(long left, long right) {
          return classify(Longs.compare(left, right));
        }

        @Override
        public ComparisonChain compare(float left, float right) {
          return classify(Float.compare(left, right));
        }

        @Override

        rnd.nextBytes(left);
        byte[] right = left.clone();
        assertThat(comparator.compare(left, right)).isEqualTo(0);
        int i = rnd.nextInt(left.length);
        left[i] ^= (byte) (1 + rnd.nextInt(255));
        assertThat(comparator.compare(left, right)).isNotEqualTo(0);
        assertThat(UnsignedBytes.compare(left[i], right[i]) > 0)
            .isEqualTo(comparator.compare(left, right) > 0);
      }
    }
  }

        logger.debug(indent + artifact + " (not setting artifactScope to: " + ignoredScope + "; local artifactScope "
                + artifact.getScope() + " wins)");

        // TODO better way than static? this might hide messages in a reactor
        if (!ignoredArtifacts.contains(artifact)) {
            logger.warn("\n\tArtifact " + artifact + " retains local artifactScope '" + artifact.getScope()

                return acl;
              }
            };
        return () -> attribute;
      } catch (IOException e) {
        // We throw a new exception each time so that the stack trace is right.
        return () -> {
          throw new IOException("Could not find user", e);
        };
      }
    }

    private static String getUsername() {
      /*

   * a qualifying run is found, its hextets are replaced by the sentinel value -1.
   *
   * @param hextets {@code int[]} mutable array of eight 16-bit hextets
   */
  private static void compressLongestRunOfZeroes(int[] hextets) {
    int bestRunStart = -1;
    int bestRunLength = -1;
    int runStart = -1;
    for (int i = 0; i < hextets.length + 1; i++) {

     * known-non-null type? But that particular problem might not arise here, since we're not
     * actually reading from the fields in any case in which they might be null (as proven by the
     * requireNonNull checks below). Plus, we're *already* lying here, since newHeader passes a null
     * key and value, which we pass to the superconstructor, even though the key and value type for

      successor(pred(), succ());
      if (left == null) {
        return right;
      } else if (right == null) {
        return left;
      } else if (left.height >= right.height) {
        AvlNode<E> newTop = pred();
        // newTop is the maximum node in my left subtree
        newTop.left = left.removeMax(newTop);
        newTop.right = right;
        newTop.distinctElements = distinctElements - 1;

@SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"}) // TODO(kevinb): the right way to explain this??
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
final class ReverseNaturalOrdering extends Ordering<Comparable<?>> implements Serializable {
  static final ReverseNaturalOrdering INSTANCE = new ReverseNaturalOrdering();

  @Override
  public int compare(Comparable<?> left, Comparable<?> right) {
    checkNotNull(left); // right null is caught later
    if (left == right) {