tester.testConstructors(PatternFilenameFilter.class, Visibility.PACKAGE);
    tester.testStaticMethods(PatternFilenameFilter.class, Visibility.PACKAGE); // currently none

    // The reason that we skip this method is discussed in a comment on the method.
    tester.ignore(PatternFilenameFilter.class.getMethod("accept", File.class, String.class));

   * not fail a test when an exception is thrown from one of its {@link TearDown} instances, but
   * this is subject to change. Also, {@code junit4.TearDownTestCase} will.
   *
   * @throws Exception for any reason. {@code TearDownTestCase} ensures that any exception thrown
   *     will not interfere with other TearDown operations.
   */
  void tearDown() throws Exception;

    for (StandardSystemProperty property : StandardSystemProperty.values()) {
      // Even though the contract in System.getProperties() specifies that a value will exist for
      // all of the listed keys, for some reason the "java.compiler" key returns null in some JVMs.
      if (property == JAVA_COMPILER) {
        continue;
      }
      // Removed in Java 9:

 * href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern">decorator pattern</a>.
 *
 * <p>Most subclasses can just use {@link SimpleForwardingFuture}.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @since 1.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public abstract class ForwardingFuture<V extends @Nullable Object> extends ForwardingObject
    implements Future<V> {

import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Test case for {@link ListenableFutureTask}.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 */
public class ListenableFutureTaskTest extends TestCase {

  private ExecutorService exec;

  protected final CountDownLatch runLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);

   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */
  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;

 * java.util.LinkedHashSet}. Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory
 * consumption at the price of moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class
 * when there is a specific reason to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate
 * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see

   * Preconditions.checkNotNull.
   *
   * (verifyNotNull has many fewer "problem" callers, so we could try to be stricter. On the other
   * hand, verifyNotNull arguably has more reason to accept nullable arguments in the first
   * place....)
   */

  /**
   * Ensures that {@code reference} is non-null, throwing a {@code VerifyException} with a default
   * message otherwise.
   *

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>If you do chain your operations manually, you may want to use {@link FluentFuture}.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @since 1.0
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public final class Futures extends GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {

  // A note on memory visibility.