be able!  I shall be a great deal too far off to trouble myself
about you:  you must manage the best way you can; --but I must be
kind to them,' thought Alice, `or perhaps they won't walk the
way I want to go!  Let me see:  I'll give them a new pair of
boots every Christmas.'

  And she went on planning to herself how she would manage it.
`They must go by the carrier,' she thought; `and how funny it'll

     * read operations anyway:
     *
     * - All (unsynchronized) read operations must first read the "count" field, and should not look
     * at table entries if it is 0.
     *
     * - All (synchronized) write operations should write to the "count" field after structurally
     * changing any bin. The operations must not take any action that could even momentarily cause a

be able!  I shall be a great deal too far off to trouble myself
about you:  you must manage the best way you can; --but I must be
kind to them,' thought Alice, `or perhaps they won't walk the
way I want to go!  Let me see:  I'll give them a new pair of
boots every Christmas.'

  And she went on planning to herself how she would manage it.
`They must go by the carrier,' she thought; `and how funny it'll

   * a later time.
   *
   * <p>Since this method uses {@code HashMap} instances internally, the keys of the supplied maps
   * must be well-behaved with respect to {@link Object#equals} and {@link Object#hashCode}.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b>If you only need to know whether two maps have the same mappings, call {@code

        Object key = new Object();
        int hash = map.hash(key);
        Object value = new Object();

        ReferenceEntry<Object, Object> entry = createDummyEntry(key, hash, value, null);
        // must recordRead for drainRecencyQueue to believe this entry is live
        segment.recordWrite(entry, 1, map.ticker.read());
        writeOrder.add(entry);
        readOrder.add(entry);
      }

        Object key = new Object();
        int hash = map.hash(key);
        Object value = new Object();

        ReferenceEntry<Object, Object> entry = createDummyEntry(key, hash, value, null);
        // must recordRead for drainRecencyQueue to believe this entry is live
        segment.recordWrite(entry, 1, map.ticker.read());
        writeOrder.add(entry);
        readOrder.add(entry);
      }

    successfulAsList(ImmutableList.of(SettableFuture.create())).cancel(true);

    /*
     * Complex (combined.cancel -> input.cancel -> other.set -> setOneValue),
     * to show that this isn't just about problems with the input future we just
     * cancelled:
     */
    final SettableFuture<String> future1 = SettableFuture.create();
    final SettableFuture<String> future2 = SettableFuture.create();

     * read operations anyway:
     *
     * - All (unsynchronized) read operations must first read the "count" field, and should not look
     * at table entries if it is 0.
     *
     * - All (synchronized) write operations should write to the "count" field after structurally
     * changing any bin. The operations must not take any action that could even momentarily cause a

    successfulAsList(ImmutableList.of(SettableFuture.create())).cancel(true);

    /*
     * Complex (combined.cancel -> input.cancel -> other.set -> setOneValue),
     * to show that this isn't just about problems with the input future we just
     * cancelled:
     */
    final SettableFuture<String> future1 = SettableFuture.create();
    final SettableFuture<String> future2 = SettableFuture.create();

 * successfully cancelled step will immediately start closing all objects captured for later closing
 * by it and by its input steps.
 *
 * <h3>Ending a pipeline</h3>
 *
 * Each {@code ClosingFuture} pipeline must be ended. To end a pipeline, decide whether you want to
 * close the captured objects automatically or manually.
 *
 * <h4>Automatically closing</h4>
 *