return result;
  }

  /*
   * If I understand correctly:
   *
   * This needs to be a @JsMethod so that J2CL knows to look for a JavaScript implemention of
   * it in Platform.native.js. (The JavaScript implementation inline below is visible to *GWT*, but
   * *J2CL* doesn't look at it.)
   *
   * However, once it's a @JsMethod, GWT produces a warning. That's because (a) the *other* purpose

 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 * @since 1.0
 */
@GwtIncompatible
@J2ktIncompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public abstract class AbstractIdleService implements Service {

  /* Thread names will look like {@code "MyService STARTING"}. */
  private final Supplier<String> threadNameSupplier = new ThreadNameSupplier();

  @WeakOuter
  private final class ThreadNameSupplier implements Supplier<String> {
    @Override

      }
    };

    abstract Map<Element, Element> create(Collection<Element> contents);
  }

  @Param({"5", "50", "500", "5000", "50000"})
  private int size;

  // TODO: look at exact (==) hits vs. equals() hits?
  @Param("0.9")
  private double hitRate;

  @Param("true")
  private boolean isUserTypeFast;

  // "" means no fixed seed
  @Param("")

  static {
    ImmutableSet.Builder<Long> testLongsBuilder = ImmutableSet.builder();
    ImmutableSet.Builder<BigInteger> testBigIntegersBuilder = ImmutableSet.builder();

    // The values here look like 111...11101...010 in binary, where the initial 111...1110 takes
    // up exactly as many bits as can be represented in the significand (24 for float, 53 for

       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

had plenty of time as she went down to look about her and to
wonder what was going to happen next.  First, she tried to look
down and make out what she was coming to, but it was too dark to
see anything; then she looked at the sides of the well, and
noticed that they were filled with cupboards and book-shelves;
here and there she saw maps and pictures hung upon pegs.  She
took down a jar from one of the shelves as she passed; it was

  private TestSuppressor suppressor;

  @Override
  protected void setUp() throws Exception {
    suppressor = new TestSuppressor();
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // TODO(cpovirk): Look up Build.VERSION.SDK_INT reflectively.
  public void testCreate() {
    assertThat(Closer.create().suppressor).isInstanceOf(Closer.SuppressingSuppressor.class);
  }

  public void testNoExceptionsThrown() throws IOException {

                  for (Integer node : graph.nodes()) {
                    Set<Integer> unused = graph.successors(node);
                  }
                  /*
                   * Also look up an earlier node so that, if the graph is using MapRetrievalCache,
                   * we read one of the fields declared in that class.
                   */
                  Set<Integer> unused = graph.successors(first);

   * GWT SortedMap implementation that we delegate to throws
   * NullPointerException if the comparator does. Since our construction
   * methods ensure that null is never present in the map, it's OK for the
   * comparator to look for it wherever it wants.
   *
   * Note that we do NOT touch the comparator returned by comparator(), which
   * should be identical to the one the user passed in. We touch only the

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed