* to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

        this.lookup = requireNonNull(lookup);
        this.defaultLifeCycles = requireNonNull(defaultLifeCycles);
    }

    // These methods deal with construction intact Plugin object that look like they come from a standard
    // <plugin/> block in a Maven POM. We have to do some wiggling to pull the sources of information
    // together and this really shows the problem of constructing a sensible default configuration but

 * artifactId, and version for the plugin; at times, the goal name for which
 * execution failed; a message detailing the problem; the ClassRealm used to
 * look up the plugin; and the Plexus exception that caused this error.
 *
 *
 */
public class PluginContainerException extends PluginManagerException {

    private ClassRealm pluginRealm;

       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed

    }

    public void execute(MavenSession session) {
        lifecycleStarter.execute(session);
    }

    // These methods deal with construction intact Plugin object that look like they come from a standard
    // <plugin/> block in a Maven POM. We have to do some wiggling to pull the sources of information
    // together and this really shows the problem of constructing a sensible default configuration but

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return Objects.hashCode(map, defaultValue);
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      // TODO(cpovirk): maybe remove "defaultValue=" to make this look like the method call does
      return "Functions.forMap(" + map + ", defaultValue=" + defaultValue + ")";
    }

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /**

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed

    if (localInputFuture != null) {
      String message = "inputFuture=[" + localInputFuture + "]";
      if (localTimer != null) {
        long delay = localTimer.getDelay(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
        // Negative delays look confusing in an error message
        if (delay > 0) {
          message += ", remaining delay=[" + delay + " ms]";
        }
      }
      return message;
    }
    return null;
  }

  @Override

                                + "plugin(s) that have goals not marked as thread-safe to support parallel execution.",
                        "While this /may/ work fine, please look for plugin updates and/or "
                                + "request plugins be made thread-safe.",
                        "If reporting an issue, report it against the plugin in question, not against Apache Maven.")) {