msgs.add("* contains the following plugin(s) that have goals not marked   *");
        msgs.add("* as @threadSafe to support parallel building.                  *");
        msgs.add("* While this /may/ work fine, please look for plugin updates    *");
        msgs.add("* and/or request plugins be made thread-safe.                   *");
        msgs.add("* If reporting an issue, report it against the plugin in        *");

       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

        this.lookup = requireNonNull(lookup);
        this.defaultLifeCycles = requireNonNull(defaultLifeCycles);
    }

    // These methods deal with construction intact Plugin object that look like they come from a standard
    // <plugin/> block in a Maven POM. We have to do some wiggling to pull the sources of information
    // together and this really shows the problem of constructing a sensible default configuration but

    return result;
  }

  /*
   * If I understand correctly:
   *
   * This needs to be a @JsMethod so that J2CL knows to look for a JavaScript implemention of
   * it in Platform.native.js. (The JavaScript implementation inline below is visible to *GWT*, but
   * *J2CL* doesn't look at it.)
   *
   * However, once it's a @JsMethod, GWT produces a warning. That's because (a) the *other* purpose

 * artifactId, and version for the plugin; at times, the goal name for which
 * execution failed; a message detailing the problem; the ClassRealm used to
 * look up the plugin; and the Plexus exception that caused this error.
 *
 *
 */
public class PluginContainerException extends PluginManagerException {

    private ClassRealm pluginRealm;

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed

    }

    public void execute(MavenSession session) {
        lifecycleStarter.execute(session);
    }

    // These methods deal with construction intact Plugin object that look like they come from a standard
    // <plugin/> block in a Maven POM. We have to do some wiggling to pull the sources of information
    // together and this really shows the problem of constructing a sensible default configuration but

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed

       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return Objects.hashCode(map, defaultValue);
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      // TODO(cpovirk): maybe remove "defaultValue=" to make this look like the method call does
      return "Functions.forMap(" + map + ", defaultValue=" + defaultValue + ")";
    }

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /**