* It's unclear whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix
   * will be to permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on
   * the other. Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * It's unclear whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix
   * will be to permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on
   * the other. Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Doubles.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(double[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

 * there is no guarantee that the domain actually exists on the internet.
 *
 * <p>One common use of this class is to determine whether a given string is likely to represent an
 * addressable domain on the web -- that is, for a candidate string {@code "xxx"}, might browsing to
 * {@code "http://xxx/"} result in a webpage being displayed? In the past, this test was frequently

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Chars.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(char[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

  }

  /**
   * Creates a garbage object that counts down the latch in its finalizer. Sequestered into a
   * separate method to make it somewhat more likely to be unreachable.
   */
  private static void createUnreachableLatchFinalizer(CountDownLatch latch) {
    Object unused =
        new Object() {
          @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/260137033

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Ints.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(int[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * resulting segment inside the cache <i>independently</i> limits its own size to approximately
   * {@code maximumSize / concurrencyLevel}.
   *
   * <p>When eviction is necessary, the cache evicts entries that are less likely to be used again.
   * For example, the cache may evict an entry because it hasn't been used recently or very often.
   *
   * <p>If {@code maximumSize} is zero, elements will be evicted immediately after being loaded into

   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of entries added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,

  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code char} matcher functionally equivalent to this one, but which may be faster to
   * query than the original; your mileage may vary. Precomputation takes time and is likely to be
   * worthwhile only if the precomputed matcher is queried many thousands of times.
   *
   * <p>This method has no effect (returns {@code this}) when called in GWT: it's unclear whether a