//      mojo descriptor which comes back. All the free form parsing needs to be done somewhere else, this is
    //      really the function of the CLI, and then the pre-processing of that output still needs to be fed into
    //      a hinting process which helps flesh out the full specification of the plugin. The plugin manager should

     *
     * <p>This map may contain null values if the constructor was invoked with {@code resolve}
     * parameter set to false. This is more efficient when only the module existence needs to
     * be tested, and module descriptors are not needed.</p>
     *
     * @see #getModuleNames()
     */
    private final Map<Path, String> descriptors;

    /**

 *
 */
@Deprecated
public class ArtifactResolutionRequest implements RepositoryRequest {
    private static final String LS = System.lineSeparator();

    private Artifact artifact;

    // Needs to go away
    // These are really overrides now, projects defining dependencies for a plugin that override what is
    // specified in the plugin itself.
    private Set<Artifact> artifactDependencies;

perform its work. This may not occur in the first versions of the plugin API but a resource needs to simply become the mapping mechanism by which parameters are taken from the REST side of the application and mapped into a method call within a given Plexus component. Whether that be the core Nexus application or a component provided by a plugin.

At the very least in the short term the resource needs to know how to look up the component that is required to perform the work. This needs to be...

    <!--
      | We may potentially want to export these, but right now I'm not sure that anything Guice specific needs
      | to be made available to plugin authors. If we find people are getting fancy and want to take advantage of
      | Guice specifics we can expose that later. Really some testing needs to be done to see full hiding
      | of Guice has any impact on what we may categorize as a standard JSR-330 based Tesla/Maven plugin.

    }

    @Override
    public Path locateExistingPom(Path projectDirectory) {
        // Note that the ModelProcessor#locatePom never returns null
        // while the ModelParser#locatePom needs to return an existing path!
        Path pom = modelParsers.stream()
                .map(m -> m.locate(projectDirectory)
                        .map(org.apache.maven.api.services.Source::getPath)

 Features like transitive dependencies and the new parent specification mechanism. The problem we run into is
 that currently we have information about a project scattered across the project.xml and the
 various properties files. What needs to be done is to encapsulate all of this in the POM.

 Typically users parameterize the use of plugins, or have custom values like ${user.name}
 for use in elements like the <developerConnection/>. It would be idea if we

     * For example, an artifact of type {@value org.apache.maven.api.Type#JAR} can be placed
     * either on the class-path or on the module-path. The project needs to make a choice
     * (possibly using heuristic rules), then to add the dependency in only one of the options
     * identified by {@link PathType}.</p>
     *
     * @return file paths to place on the different tool options

   |
   | Default: ${user.home}/.m2/repository
  <localRepository>/path/to/local/repo</localRepository>
  -->

  <!-- interactiveMode
   | This will determine whether maven prompts you when it needs input. If set to false,
   | maven will use a sensible default value, perhaps based on some other setting, for
   | the parameter in question.
   |
   | Default: true
  <interactiveMode>true</interactiveMode>
  -->

    // ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    public boolean hasVersionRangeViolations() {
        return versionRangeViolations != null;
    }

    /**
     * TODO this needs to accept a {@link OverConstrainedVersionException} as returned by
     *       {@link #getVersionRangeViolation(int)} but it's not used like that in