RandomHasherAction.pickAtRandom(random).performAction(random, sinksAndControl);
      }
      // We need to ensure that at least 4 bytes have been put into the hasher or else
      // Hasher#hash will throw an ISE.
      int intToPut = random.nextInt();
      for (Hasher hasher : sinksAndControl) {
        hasher.putInt(intToPut);
      }
      for (Sink sink : sinks) {
        HashCode unused = sink.hash();
      }

 *
 * <p>Its speed is comparable to CityHash64, and its quality of hashing is at least as good.
 *
 * <p>Note to maintainers: This implementation relies on signed arithmetic being bit-wise equivalent
 * to unsigned arithmetic in all cases except:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>comparisons (signed values can be negative)
 *   <li>division (avoided here)
 *   <li>shifting (right shift must be unsigned)
 * </ul>

      fail("No exception thrown");
    } catch (Exception e) {
      if (!(e instanceof SomeCheckedException)) {
        throw e;
      }
    }

    // But the second time, AbstractIterator itself throws an ISE
    try {
      iter.hasNext();
      fail("No exception thrown");
    } catch (IllegalStateException expected) {
    }
  }

  public void testException() {

  }

  /**
   * Catches a bug where when constructing a service manager failed, later interactions with the
   * service could cause IllegalStateExceptions inside the partially constructed ServiceManager.
   * This ISE wouldn't actually bubble up but would get logged by ExecutionQueue. This obfuscated
   * the original error (which was not constructing ServiceManager correctly).
   */
  public void testPartiallyConstructedManager() {

certainly was not here before,' said Alice,) and round the neck
of the bottle was a paper label, with the words `DRINK ME'
beautifully printed on it in large letters.

  It was all very well to say `Drink me,' but the wise little
Alice was not going to do THAT in a hurry.  `No, I'll look
first,' she said, `and see whether it's marked "poison" or not';
for she had read several nice little histories about children who

    this.errorMessage = errorMessage;
  }

  // Override hashCode() to access delegate directly (so that it doesn't trigger the validate() call
  // via delegate()); it seems inappropriate to throw ISE on this method.
  @Override
  public int hashCode() {
    return delegate.hashCode();
  }

  private void validate() {
    // Don't use checkState(), because we don't want the overhead of generating the error message

        if (stackWithLastReturnedElementAtTop == null) {
          throw PermittedMetaException.UOE_OR_ISE;
        } else {
          throw PermittedMetaException.UOE;
        }
      } else if (stackWithLastReturnedElementAtTop == null) {
        throw PermittedMetaException.ISE;
      }
    }

    private List<E> getElements() {
      List<E> elements = new ArrayList<>();

  public void testNoProviders() {
    ProviderList providers = Providers.getProviderList();
    Providers.setProviderList(ProviderList.newList());
    try {
      Hashing.hmacMd5(MD5_KEY);
      fail("expected ISE");
    } catch (IllegalStateException expected) {
    } finally {
      Providers.setProviderList(providers);
    }
  }

  public void testMultipleUpdates() throws Exception {

    assertEquals("google.com", InternetDomainName.from("www.google.com").parent().toString());

    try {
      InternetDomainName.from("com").parent();
      fail("'com' should throw ISE on .parent() call");
    } catch (IllegalStateException expected) {
    }
  }

  public void testChild() {
    InternetDomainName domain = InternetDomainName.from("foo.com");

   *
   * <p>This is designed for generating persistent fingerprints of strings. It isn't
   * cryptographically secure, but it produces a high-quality hash with few collisions. Fingerprints
   * generated using this are byte-wise identical to those created using the C++ version, but note
   * that this uses unsigned integers (see {@link com.google.common.primitives.UnsignedInts}).
   * Comparisons between the two should take this into account.
   *