}
    final ReentrantLock lock = this.lock;
    lock.lock();

    boolean satisfied = false;
    try {
      return satisfied = guard.isSatisfied();
    } finally {
      if (!satisfied) {
        lock.unlock();
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Enters this monitor if the guard is satisfied. Blocks at most the given time acquiring the
   * lock, but does not wait for the guard to be satisfied.

    }

    /*
     * This is an unsynchronized read! After the read, the function returns immediately or acquires
     * the lock to check again. Since an IDLE state was observed inside the preceding synchronized
     * block, and reference field assignment is atomic, this may save reacquiring the lock when
     * another thread or the worker task has cleared the count and set the state.
     *

   *
   * Lock lockA = factory1.newReentrantLock(MyLockOrder.FIRST);
   * Lock lockB = factory1.newReentrantLock(MyLockOrder.FIRST);
   * Lock lockC = factory2.newReentrantLock(MyLockOrder.FIRST);
   *
   * lockA.lock();
   *
   * lockB.lock();  // will throw an IllegalStateException
   * lockC.lock();  // will throw an IllegalStateException
   *
   * lockA.lock();  // reentrant acquisition is okay

    byte[] key = fillByteArray(80, 0xaa);
    String data = "Test Using Larger Than Block-Size Key - Hash Key First";

    checkSha1("aa4ae5e15272d00e95705637ce8a3b55ed402112", key, data);
  }

  public void testRfc2202_hmacSha1_case7() {
    byte[] key = fillByteArray(80, 0xaa);
    String data = "Test Using Larger Than Block-Size Key and Larger Than One Block-Size Data";

    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());

    // Start the task to put it in the RUNNING state.  Have to use a separate
    // thread because the task will block on the task latch after unblocking
    // the run latch.
    exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());

  }

  public void testFutureCancellableBeforeFunctionCompletion() throws Exception {
    // Set the result in a separate thread since this test runs the function
    // (which will block) in the same thread.
    new Thread() {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        inputFuture.set(SLOW_FUNC_VALID_INPUT_DATA);
      }
    }.start();
    funcIsWaitingLatch.await();

   */
  public void testRegularFutureInterrupted() throws ExecutionException {

    /*
     * Here's the order of events that we want.
     *
     * 1. The client thread begins to block on a get() call to a future.
     * 2. The client thread is interrupted sometime before the result would be
     *   available.
     * 3. We expect the client's get() to throw an InterruptedException.

    service.addListener(new RecordingListener(service), directExecutor());
    Thread thread =
        new Thread() {
          @Override
          public void run() {
            // Internally stopAsync() grabs a lock, this could be any such method on
            // AbstractService.
            service.stopAsync();
          }
        };
    thread.start();
    thread.join(LONG_TIMEOUT_MILLIS);

    MEDIUM_DELAY_MS = SHORT_DELAY_MS * 10;
    LONG_DELAY_MS = SHORT_DELAY_MS * 200;
  }

  /**
   * Returns a timeout in milliseconds to be used in tests that verify that operations block or time
   * out.
   */
  long timeoutMillis() {
    return SHORT_DELAY_MS / 4;
  }

  /** Returns a new Date instance representing a time delayMillis milliseconds in the future. */

    // is likely to be a bug anyway.

    // N.B. All writes to the list and the next pointers must have happened before the above
    // synchronized block, so we can iterate the list without the lock held here.
    RunnableExecutorPair reversedList = null;
    while (list != null) {
      RunnableExecutorPair tmp = list;
      list = list.next;
      tmp.next = reversedList;