* representation will be hard to change. Instead, use <a
 * href="http://errorprone.info/bugpattern/RestrictedApi">RestrictedApiChecker</a>, which enforces
 * fine-grained visibility policies.
 *
 * @author Johannes Henkel
 */
@GwtCompatible
public @interface VisibleForTesting {

 * representation will be hard to change. Instead, use <a
 * href="http://errorprone.info/bugpattern/RestrictedApi">RestrictedApiChecker</a>, which enforces
 * fine-grained visibility policies.
 *
 * @author Johannes Henkel
 */
@GwtCompatible
public @interface VisibleForTesting {

  public TestSuite createTestSuite() {
    checkCanCreate();

    logger.fine(" Testing: " + name);
    logger.fine("Features: " + formatFeatureSet(features));

    FeatureUtil.addImpliedFeatures(features);

    logger.fine("Expanded: " + formatFeatureSet(features));

    @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // class literals

   * @param pattern the pattern on which to filter file names
   */
  public PatternFilenameFilter(Pattern pattern) {
    this.pattern = Preconditions.checkNotNull(pattern);
  }

  /*
   * Our implementation works fine with a null `dir`. However, there's nothing in the documentation
   * of the supertype that suggests that implementations are expected to tolerate null. That said, I

  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeFine1() {
    Optional<Number> optionalInt = Optional.of((Number) 1);
    Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // fine
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeFine2() {
    FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();

          if (newValue == 0) {
            // Just CASed to 0; remove the entry to clean up the map. If the removal fails,
            // another thread has already replaced it with a new counter, which is fine.
            countMap.remove(element, existingCounter);
          }
          return oldValue;
        }
      } else {
        return 0;
      }
    }
  }

  /**

        .testEquals();
  }

  public void testRequireBracketsForIPv6() {
    // Bracketed IPv6 works fine.
    assertEquals("::1", HostAndPort.fromString("[::1]").requireBracketsForIPv6().getHost());
    assertEquals("::1", HostAndPort.fromString("[::1]:80").requireBracketsForIPv6().getHost());
    // Non-bracketed non-IPv6 works fine.
    assertEquals("x", HostAndPort.fromString("x").requireBracketsForIPv6().getHost());

        .testEquals();
  }

  public void testRequireBracketsForIPv6() {
    // Bracketed IPv6 works fine.
    assertEquals("::1", HostAndPort.fromString("[::1]").requireBracketsForIPv6().getHost());
    assertEquals("::1", HostAndPort.fromString("[::1]:80").requireBracketsForIPv6().getHost());
    // Non-bracketed non-IPv6 works fine.
    assertEquals("x", HostAndPort.fromString("x").requireBracketsForIPv6().getHost());

  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeFine1() {
    Optional<Number> optionalInt = Optional.of((Number) 1);
    Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // fine
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeFine2() {
    FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();

   *
   * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller
   * calls `create(Foo.class)`, rather than `create(map)`. That's fine; we just shouldn't rely on
   * it.
   */
  transient Class<K> keyTypeOrObjectUnderJ2cl;
  transient Class<V> valueTypeOrObjectUnderJ2cl;

  /**