* No escribirías una aplicación directamente en Uvicorn. Eso significaría que tu código tendría que incluir más o menos, al menos, todo el código proporcionado por Starlette (o **FastAPI**). Y si hicieras eso, tu aplicación final tendría la misma sobrecarga que si hubieras usado un framework y minimizado el código de tu aplicación y los errores.
    * Si estás comparando Uvicorn, compáralo con los servidores de aplicaciones Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc.

    * You wouldn't write an application in Uvicorn directly. That would mean that your code would have to include more or less, at least, all the code provided by Starlette (or **FastAPI**). And if you did that, your final application would have the same overhead as having used a framework and minimizing your app code and bugs.
    * If you are comparing Uvicorn, compare it against Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc. Application servers.
* **Starlette**:

automatically. And if you **build** the client it will error out if you have any **mismatch** in the data used.

So, you would **detect many errors** very early in the development cycle instead of having to wait for the errors to show up to your final users in production and then trying to debug where the problem is. ✨...

Building docs for: en
Building docs for: es
Successfully built docs for: es
```

</div>

This builds all those independent MkDocs sites for each language, combines them, and generates the final output at `./site/`.

Then you can serve that with the command `serve`:

<div class="termy">

```console
// Use the command "serve" after running "build-all"
$ python ./scripts/docs.py serve

    Then APIStar stopped to exist as a server and Starlette was created, and was a new better foundation for such a system. That was the final inspiration to build **FastAPI**.

    I consider **FastAPI** a "spiritual successor" to APIStar, while improving and increasing the features, typing system, and other parts, based on the learnings from all these previous tools.

Ela é importada/incluída diretamente no FastAPI para que você possa importá-la do `fastapi` e evitar a importação acidental da alternativa `BackgroundTask` (sem o `s` no final) de `starlette.background`.

---

**Note** : vous pouvez mélanger `def` et `async def` dans vos *fonctions de chemin* autant que nécessaire, **FastAPI** saura faire ce qu'il faut avec.

Au final, peu importe le cas parmi ceux ci-dessus, **FastAPI** fonctionnera de manière asynchrone et sera extrêmement rapide.

And then, we extend that copy `dict`, adding another key-value pair: `"id": last_record_id`:

```Python
{**note.dict(), "id": last_record_id}
```

So, the final result returned would be something like:

```Python
{
    "id": 1,
    "text": "Some note",
    "completed": False,
}
```

## Check it

<img src="/img/tutorial/security/image02.png">

!!! note
    It doesn't matter what you type in the form, it won't work yet. But we'll get there.

This is of course not the frontend for the final users, but it's a great automatic tool to document interactively all your API.

It can be used by the frontend team (that can also be yourself).

It can be used by third party applications and systems.

Então ele constrói todos aqueles _sites_ independentes MkDocs para cada linguagem, combina eles, e gera a saída final em `./site/`.

Então você poderá "servir" eles com o comando `serve`:

<div class="termy">

```console
// Use o comando "serve" após rodar "build-all"
$ python ./scripts/docs.py serve