When calling <a href="/pkg/crypto/x509#CreateCertificate"><code>CreateCertificate</code></a>, the <code>Policies</code> field is ignored, and
      policies are taken from the <code>PolicyIdentifiers</code> field. Using the <code>x509usepolicies=1</code> GODEBUG setting inverts this,

do exactly this.
</p>

<p>
A read of an array, struct, or complex number
may by implemented as a read of each individual sub-value
(array element, struct field, or real/imaginary component),
in any order.
Similarly, a write of an array, struct, or complex number
may be implemented as a write of each individual sub-value,
in any order.
</p>

<p>

struct {
	T1        // field name is T1
	*T2       // field name is T2
	P.T3      // field name is T3
	*P.T4     // field name is T4
	x, y int  // field names are x and y
}
</pre>

<p>
The following declaration is illegal because field names must be unique
in a struct type:
</p>

<pre>
struct {
	T     // conflicts with embedded field *T and *P.T

For example, given the Go declaration <code>const bufSize =
1024</code>, assembly code can refer to the value of this constant
as <code>const_bufSize</code>.
</p>

<p>
Field offsets are of the form <code><i>type</i>_<i>field</i></code>.
Struct sizes are of the form <code><i>type</i>__size</code>.
For example, consider the following Go definition:
</p>

<pre>
type reader struct {
	buf [bufSize]byte

struct {
	T1        // field name is T1
	*T2       // field name is T2
	P.T3      // field name is T3
	*P.T4     // field name is T4
	x, y int  // field names are x and y
}
</pre>

<p>
The following declaration is illegal because field names must be unique
in a struct type:
</p>

<pre>
struct {
	T     // conflicts with embedded field *T and *P.T