<name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4102</name>
  <description>
    Verify that the effective value of an inherited property reflects the values of any nested property
    as defined by the child. This boils down to the order of inheritance and (parent) interpolation.
  </description>

  <properties>
    <overridden>PARENT</overridden>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4102 :: Child</name>
  <description>
    Verify that the effective value of an inherited property reflects the values of any nested property
    as defined by the child. This boils down to the order of inheritance and (parent) interpolation.
  </description>

  <properties>
    <overridden>CHILD</overridden>
  </properties>

  <profiles>
    <profile>
      <id>it-child</id>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4102</name>
  <description>
    Verify that the effective value of an inherited property reflects the values of any nested property
    as defined by the child. This boils down to the order of inheritance and (parent) interpolation.
  </description>

  <properties>
    <overridden>PARENT</overridden>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4102 :: Child</name>
  <description>
    Verify that the effective value of an inherited property reflects the values of any nested property
    as defined by the child. This boils down to the order of inheritance and (parent) interpolation.
  </description>

  <properties>
    <overridden>CHILD</overridden>
  </properties>

        <forkId implementation="int" default-value="-1">${forkId}</forkId>
      </configuration>
    </mojo>
    <mojo>
      <goal>clear-fork-context</goal>
      <description>Tear down any build state used during the previous forked execution.</description>
      <requiresDirectInvocation>false</requiresDirectInvocation>
      <requiresProject>false</requiresProject>
      <requiresReports>false</requiresReports>

  <packaging>jar</packaging>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4107</name>
  <description>
    Test that POM interpolation uses the property values from the dominant profile source (POM vs. settings.xml).
    This boils down to the proper order of profile injection and interpolation, i.e.
    interpolate after profiles from all sources are injected.
  </description>

  <properties>

    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.gwt.core.Core" />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.user.User" />

    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.core.Core" />

    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.core.Core" />

    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.math.Math" />