J'ai testé plusieurs idées dans les éditeurs Python les plus populaires : PyCharm, VS Code, les éditeurs basés sur Jedi.

D'après la dernière <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Enquête Développeurs Python</a>, cela couvre environ 80% des utilisateurs.

## Design

Then I spent some time designing the developer "API" I wanted to have as a user (as a developer using FastAPI).

I tested several ideas in the most popular Python editors: PyCharm, VS Code, Jedi based editors.

By the last <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Python Developer Survey</a>, that covers about 80% of the users.

    "Development Status :: 4 - Beta",
    "Environment :: Web Environment",
    "Framework :: AsyncIO",
    "Framework :: FastAPI",
    "Framework :: Pydantic",
    "Framework :: Pydantic :: 1",
    "Intended Audience :: Developers",
    "License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License",
    "Programming Language :: Python :: 3 :: Only",
    "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.8",
    "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.9",

Я проверил несколько идей на самых популярных редакторах кода среди Python-разработчиков: PyCharm, VS Code, Jedi.

Данные по редакторам я взял из <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">опроса Python-разработчиков</a>, который охватываает около 80% пользователей.

Eu testei várias ideias nos editores Python mais populares: PyCharm, VS Code, e editores baseados no Jedi.

Pela última <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Pesquisa do Desenvolvedor Python</a>, isso cobre cerca de 80% dos usuários.

Çeşitli fikirleri en popüler Python editörlerinde test ettim: PyCharm, VS Code, Jedi tabanlı editörler.

Bu test, en son <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Python Developer Survey</a>'ine göre, kullanıcıların yaklaşık %80'inin kullandığı editörleri kapsıyor.

    Using these `dependencies` in the *path operation decorator* you can make sure they are executed while avoiding editor/tooling errors.

    It might also help avoid confusion for new developers that see an unused parameter in your code and could think it's unnecessary.

!!! info
    In this example we use invented custom headers `X-Key` and `X-Token`.

Ich habe mehrere Ideen in den beliebtesten Python-Editoren getestet: PyCharm, VS Code, Jedi-basierte Editoren.

Laut der letzten <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Python-Entwickler-Umfrage</a>, deckt das etwa 80 % der Benutzer ab.

The process that happens when your API app calls the *external API* is named a "callback". Because the software that the external developer wrote sends a request to your API and then your API *calls back*, sending a request to an *external API* (that was probably created by the same developer).

## 设计

然后，我又花了一些时间从用户角度（使用 FastAPI 的开发者）设计了开发者 **API**。

同时，我还在最流行的 Python 代码编辑器中测试了很多思路，包括 PyCharm、VS Code、基于 Jedi 的编辑器。

根据最新 <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Python 开发者调研报告</a>显示，这几种编辑器覆盖了约 80% 的用户。

也就是说，**FastAPI** 针对差不多 80% 的 Python 开发者使用的编辑器进行了测试，而且其它大多数编辑器的工作方式也与之类似，因此，**FastAPI** 的优势几乎能在所有编辑器上体现。