`You did!' said the Hatter.

  `I deny it!' said the March Hare.

  `He denies it,' said the King:  `leave out that part.'

  `Well, at any rate, the Dormouse said--' the Hatter went on,
looking anxiously round to see if he would deny it too:  but the
Dormouse denied nothing, being fast asleep.

  `After that,' continued the Hatter, `I cut some more bread-
and-butter--'

    builder.add(Range.<Integer>all());

    // Add one-ended ranges
    for (int i = MIN_BOUND; i <= MAX_BOUND; i++) {
      for (BoundType type : BoundType.values()) {
        builder.add(Range.upTo(i, type));
        builder.add(Range.downTo(i, type));
      }
    }

    // Add two-ended ranges
    for (int i = MIN_BOUND; i <= MAX_BOUND; i++) {

      try {
        workOnQueue();
      } catch (Error e) {
        synchronized (queue) {
          workerRunningState = IDLE;
        }
        throw e;
        // The execution of a task has ended abnormally.
        // We could have tasks left in the queue, so should perhaps try to restart a worker,
        // but then the Error will get delayed if we are using a direct (same thread) executor.
      }
    }

  //    finally { guard.unlock(); }
  // Here are Justin's design notes about this:
  //
  // This idea has come up from time to time, and I think one of my
  // earlier versions of Monitor even did something like this. I ended
  // up strongly favoring the current interface.
  //
  // I probably can't remember all the reasons (it's possible you
  // could find them in the code review archives), but here are a few:
  //

    builder.add(Range.<Integer>all());

    // Add one-ended ranges
    for (int i = MIN_BOUND; i <= MAX_BOUND; i++) {
      for (BoundType type : BoundType.values()) {
        builder.add(Range.upTo(i, type));
        builder.add(Range.downTo(i, type));
      }
    }

    // Add two-ended ranges
    for (int i = MIN_BOUND; i <= MAX_BOUND; i++) {
      for (int j = i + 1; j <= MAX_BOUND; j++) {

        .that(bucketsOf(map1))
        .isEqualTo(initialBuckets);

    // Ensure that referenceMap, which doesn't use WithExpectedSize, ends up with the same table
    // size as the other two maps. If it ended up with a smaller size that would imply that we
    // computed the wrong initial capacity.
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
      referenceMap.put(i, null);
    }

        .that(bucketsOf(map1))
        .isEqualTo(initialBuckets);

    // Ensure that referenceMap, which doesn't use WithExpectedSize, ends up with the same table
    // size as the other two maps. If it ended up with a smaller size that would imply that we
    // computed the wrong initial capacity.
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
      referenceMap.put(i, null);
    }

  `You did!' said the Hatter.

  `I deny it!' said the March Hare.

  `He denies it,' said the King:  `leave out that part.'

  `Well, at any rate, the Dormouse said--' the Hatter went on,
looking anxiously round to see if he would deny it too:  but the
Dormouse denied nothing, being fast asleep.

  `After that,' continued the Hatter, `I cut some more bread-
and-butter--'

-   [guava-announce: Announcements of releases and upcoming significant changes](https://groups.google.com/group/guava-announce)
-   [guava-discuss: For open-ended questions and discussion](https://groups.google.com/group/guava-discuss)

## IMPORTANT WARNINGS

1.  APIs marked with the `@Beta` annotation at the class or method level are

import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import java.util.PriorityQueue;
import java.util.Queue;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A double-ended priority queue, which provides constant-time access to both its least element and
 * its greatest element, as determined by the queue's specified comparator. If no comparator is